SQL Compare

Welcome to the SQL Compare feature suggestion list. Find out more information about SQL Compare at http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-compare/.

If you have any questions, need help or have found a bug in SQL Compare, please visit the forums at http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewforum.php?f=154

How can we improve SQL Compare?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can vote and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can vote on it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Include new objects by default

    I need an option to make SQL Compare includes new objects by default. It will help when not all objects from source database should be synchronized with destination database. This was default behavior in SQL Compare 7.

    1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    • Compare doesn't detect primary key which has the same name as a primary key on another table.

      I recently ran into a scenario where SQL Compare was insisting that one of my developers create a primary key, yet every time he ran the script it would state that the primary key already exists. After looking into it, I found that someone made a backup copy of this table by rename and create, but the primary key was still on that backup table with the exact same name. SQL Compare should at least warn if the primary key name exists already in the database (currently, there is no warning). When I select the backup table to be dropped,…

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      • Do you have a version for DB2??

        SQLCompare is brilliant.
        Do you have a build for DB2?

        1 vote
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        • Compare on object

          Need an option/ability to re-compare just one object like table, procedure,view or function etc. If my database contains 1000+ objects, if I modify one of them, there should be right click re-compare menu to just re-compare that one object. Instead of comparing the whole database. Comparing whole database take a bit of time when work remotely. Even though I have filters, it takes quite a bit of time.

          4 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          • Is there a way to just generate sql to add missing columns, tables, etc

            Is there a way to just generate sql to add missing columns, tables, stored procedures, triggers to go from one database to another, not make everything the same

            1 vote
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • Price

              I have to say the tool is fantastic. That said the cost is a little prohibitive for me considering there are some free alternatives out there. These alternatives are not as feature rich as sql compare.

              1 vote
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              • Allow for certain changes to be taken

                I have a table in which on both databases they were changes.
                Now i need the partitioniong from db A but I need to keep the new column added in db B..

                been using the redgate toolbelt for years, the best schema compare tool! the Visual studio s**** big time.

                1 vote
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  I agree to the terms of service
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Support for Replicated Databases

                  I would like to push schema changes to a transactionally replicated database. Now, SQL Compare breaks replication when I push schema changes. Please add support for sp_repladdcolumn and so_repldropcolumn rather than ALTER TABLE.

                  36 votes
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    I agree to the terms of service
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Bug: deploying schema changes with migration script

                    When deploying changes to stored procedures via migration script to handle a necessary data transform, the migration script portion of the script does not have a batch terminator of GO automatically appended to it if missing, which results in the first set of extended properties for the database version number being appended to the code of the stored procedure (up to the first GO in that portion of the script).

                    1 vote
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      I agree to the terms of service
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                    • Snapshots include SQL Source Control revision number

                      When using the SQL Snapper tool to take a snapshot on an unconnected SQL Server, the snapshot does not include the database revision number and therefore, when comparing it against source control, does not include the necessary migration scripts to get the database up to date.

                      It would be much better if the snapshot utility included the meta data form the extended properties of a database that specify the revision number in order to better facilitate migration scripts during deployment.

                      4 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        I agree to the terms of service
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                      • Support Last Modified Date for stored procedures

                        Add an option to ignore changes that are older on one system. For example, usp_Proc_1 was modified earlier on my source system than the destination system, and with this option on, it wouldn't count as a change.

                        1 vote
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          I agree to the terms of service
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                        • When altering a table used in a FK, change event sequence to allow the alter to occur

                          Altering a table used in a FK constrainte results in:
                          The following error message was returned from the SQL Server:

                          [3723] An explicit DROP INDEX is not allowed on index 'dbo.dim_Financial_Chart_Of_Account.ixuc_dim_Financial_Chart_Of_Account__Financial_Chart_Of_Account_ID'. It is being used for FOREIGN KEY constraint enforcement.

                          The following SQL command caused the error:

                          DROP INDEX [ixuc_dim_Financial_Chart_Of_Account__Financial_Chart_Of_Account_ID] ON [dbo].[dim_Financial_Chart_Of_Account]

                          1 vote
                          Vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            I agree to the terms of service
                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • Add support for Microsoft PDW

                            It would be nice to also support PDW databases

                            28 votes
                            Vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              I agree to the terms of service
                              Signed in as (Sign out)
                              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                              0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                            • How do I list only tables that have different field lengths, or show only tables missing indexes?

                              August 11, 2014 12:12
                              Mitchell McClure
                              Thanks; I've found most of what I was looking for in the Project Options: Ignore list. I'm just trying to filter the results list to include only the most critical items, but this would be easier to do if SQL Compare would group those differences into categories. For example: currently the program lists tables with any and all types of differences, and in the lower, detail view shows all of those specific differences; instead it should list categories such as "Missing or Different Primary Keys", "Missing or Different Fields", "...Foreign Keys", etc...and then beneath…

                              1 vote
                              Vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                I agree to the terms of service
                                Signed in as (Sign out)
                                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                              • Highlight changes in column names in the table mapping

                                I have a table with 200 columns, The table had a major change with a lot of the columns being renamed. For some reason SqlCompare mapped EmployeeGuid to PointOfInterestGuid. when looking on the field mapping it is very hard to see that the mapping was made because on both sides of the list the column list looks the same.

                                My suggestion: For any pair of mapped column, highlight in red any character in the column name that is different for the other side. This will allow easier spotting of wrong mapping and of column name changes

                                3 votes
                                Vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  I agree to the terms of service
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                • Improve the command line experience when passing a project file

                                  Use the options stored in the project file during command line execution. Having to specify and keep these options in sync is not only a duplication of effort but prone to error. Any options passed explicitly to the command line should be merged with the project options with the command line taking precedence.

                                  Similarly, performing a sync using the command line and passing a project file will not take into account any new objects in the database unless the project has been updated to explicitly include them. A sync operation should, include all differences by default unless explicitly excluded or…

                                  6 votes
                                  Vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    I agree to the terms of service
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Import Objects list for filter

                                    I get a list of objects to deploy and only those objects are deployed. I have to ether build a filter manually or go through each object in the list. Sometimes there are hundreds and it is tedious to do. I have hacked the filter file(scpf) before and thought of writing a script to do this. The import file could be schema in column 1 and object name in column 2. I use (include) only not (exclude). This seems it would be easy for you guys to do.
                                    Example in File

                                    <Include>True</Include>
                                    <Expression>((@SCHEMA = 'IMADMIN') AND (@NAME = 'proc_AddPayerIfpRealationship')) OR…

                                    5 votes
                                    Vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      I agree to the terms of service
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • Allow the Sql Differences window to be maximized

                                      Since it is possible to detach the SQL Differences window, the next logical step would be able to maximize this window on a second monitor. That way we could see the list of object differences on one monitor and the specific differences on a different monitor. As it functions now, you have to click and drag the corner of the window to make it as close to the size of the second monitor as you can with the mouse. Also, it would be great to have this setting remembered between SQL Compare sessions.

                                      3 votes
                                      Vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        I agree to the terms of service
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                        0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                      • Make SQL Compare Three-part identifiers aware and filterable

                                        Not always a deployed database has the same name of the source database due to customers' naming conventions. So it'd be great if SQL Compare will be three-part identifiers aware, so that if you compare the same table from different named databases as following:

                                        SELECT *
                                        FROM MyDatabaseA.MyTable

                                        SELECT *
                                        FROM MyDatabaseB.MyTable

                                        SQL Compare will not show them as different if you want a three-part identifiers insensitive comparison.

                                        5 votes
                                        Vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          I agree to the terms of service
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                          0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                        • Consistent statement order in SQL Compare deployment scripts

                                          There is one suggestion/recommendation we have worth passing along. As we make small changes in database_A and generate a deployment script against a static database_B, the order of statements comes out drastically different each time. For instance, just making a column nullable in one table will cause the entire deployment script to be reordered. This makes peer reviews more difficult.
                                          While we understand dependencies can affect the order of statements in the deployment script, we wonder if there couldn’t be an option to keep the order consistent where no dependency-enforced order exists, perhaps ordering based on object id.

                                          7 votes
                                          Vote
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            I agree to the terms of service
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                            0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          ← Previous 1 3 4 5 9 10
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          SQL Compare

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base