Skip to content

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 480 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Kendra responded

    Thank you everyone for your comments and votes on this over the years. While I don’t have a 100% full resolution for this suggestion, I can sum up our current recommendations here. Continued feedback is very welcome.

    Our current recommendation is to use the post-deployment script feature of SQL Source Control (released in V6.3) to manage SQL Server Agent jobs.

    An example script for this is here: https://documentation.red-gate.com/soc/common-tasks/working-with-pre-post-deployment-scripts/create-sql-server-agent-job

    As some commenters in this thread have alluded to, it is possible (and sometimes very common) for SQL Agent jobs to have steps that touch multiple databases on a single SQL Server Instance. For this reason, some customers prefer to create a separate database for instance-level management and objects (sometimes named DBA or similar) and choose to manage things like linked servers and SQL Agent jobs with the post-script associated with that database.

    This separate-database architecture also makes sense if the jobs…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Aleksandar commented  · 

    I know this might be a bit late for some, but a workaround for this would be to to put the msdb database in source control and filter out everything other than the table below:

    msdb.dbo.sysjobsteps

    It stores all the steps for all jobs, any updates to jobs will update this table. only issue is that you'd have to get people to remember to commit the change when they change a job.

    Might even be useful for the redgate team to use this table and integrate jobs into version control... ;)