53 results found
-
I just installed a "minor update". If it is minor, why are you prompting me to read a 19 page, 7,500 word licence agreement?
Only display changes to the agreement and stop wasting my time.
4 votes -
Red Gate Source control should only need one workspace
Red Gate Source control should only need one workspace. Is there a specific reason Red Gate creates multiple workspaces per database linked? This is creating a mess of my workspaces.
58 votes -
Could you please add a feature that would allow one to view the 'dependencies' when on the 'Commit to source control' window appears. It wou
Could you please add a feature that would allow one to view the 'dependencies' when on the 'Commit to source control' window appears.
This would be useful to see which of the tables you are about to commit relates to the 'dependencies' tables in the pop up.
2 votes -
Items removed from the DB aren't indicated as a DB change by the SSMS GUI.
No Category for BUGS? When comparing the TFS version to live DB in SSMS, objects missing from live DB don't cause the "change" visual queue. One must select the DB/SQLSource Control/Get Latest Tab to realize there are extra items in the DB. SQL compare does not have this issue.
3 votes -
1 vote
-
Set default options for comparison
Allow use to set default comparison options e.g. <AddDatabaseUseStatement> rather than have to do it for every individual database linked.
5 votes -
Partition scheme Bug?
We have a partition scheme setup using a function
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [partitionSchemeSystemId]
AS PARTITION [partitionFunctionSystemId]
TO ([PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY])when SourceControl has populated SVN it has added an extra partition to the scheme
Sourcecontrol sees these as being the same between the DB used to populate SVN but when we link a new instance of the database to sourcecontrol it identifies a conflict
4 votes -
Allow include Identity option at table level instead of Database level.
In many databases there few tables with static values which are mapped with enums in the code. For such tables, Include Identity columns option is required. However, for few tables, we may not require to maintain the same primary key value in the source and target DB. Please do the needful
29 votes -
Allow users to change the Transaction Isolation Level. Serializable causes problems with linked servers.
Ever since updating to 3.6.0.3, the default Transaction Isolation Level in deployment scripts is Serializable. If a stored procedure has a reference to a linked database it will fail. I have to manually edit every script now and change it to Read Committed...
4 votes -
Suppress credentials prompt when SSMS starts
Sometimes when I launch SSMS I see the "Source Control Credentials Required" dialog.
"""
Your source control system requires credentials.Enter the user name and password for the repository:
"""It's prompting me to update the expired credentials for one of my old development projects.
I don't want to update the credentials right now, but SQL Source Control is very persistent about it.
When I click Cancel, the dialog immediately reappears!
After clicking cancel about 10 times in a row, it finally stops asking.
Can you suppress the dialog on startup?
It would be better to ask only when it…
3 votes -
Allow Filter by object Type
It would be really great if there was an option to filter exclusions from source control by object type in addition to the Schema and Name as it is presently.
3 votes -
Override the comments italicized text when entering a comment
When committing changes, the text area shows a default message that states: "Type a comment describing your changes..."
It would be ideal if you could override this statement with one of your own in some sort of a configuration file:
Ex: "Comments are required, please reference ticket number before checking in your code..."
Speaking of a configuration file, why isn't there one???
3 votes -
Directory and File Locations
Allow the ability to control the location of ALL files/data (permanent and temporary and logging, etc) associated with SSC. This should be asked during setup, but should also be user configurable after install.
1 vote -
Simplify datalink source code repository migration
We recently migrated our svn repo to HTTPS and part of that process was for our devs to update their SQL Source Control datalinks.
We ran into 4 issues:
1) When opening SSMS for the first time, we were inundated by SQL Source Control to update our credentials.
2) After hitting cancel 10 times, we were able to get to the Setup tab. Where we thought we could just edit the existing link, but instead we had to Unlink the database first.
3) After unlinking, all the options on the Setup tab disappeared requiring a restart of SSMS. I can…1 vote -
initial checkout failure not cought
I was checking out a database that contained changes. (new machine, database restored from backup)
The initial checkout from SVN failed because of a network issue. However the UI did not report that failure and instead proceeded to compare my current database to the local broken working copy.
It seems that the code executing the checkout is wrapped in an exception eating try catch block.
1 vote -
I just want to add, query by query, to track changes. When i commit a query, the whole damn DB of queries (1000+) loads. Too cumbersome.
New user, I just want to add a query as I develop, to track changes. I expect to 1) Add a query to source control. 2) Commit the query 3) Track changes........ Problem is, every time I commit the query, the entire DB stored procedures load into memory, slow and not working for me.
4 votes -
Migrated to new SVN server, timeout on existing linked databases is way too long
We moved our SVN repositories to a new server and the old server is already gone. I then moved ahead and tried to unlink my existing databases so I can link them to new server address (svn relocate would be another option)... Problem is that sql source control is now trying to connect to the old server and the unlink dialog is just sitting there for minutes, and I'm getting "Visual Studio is busy...." messages
1 vote -
SQL Source Control 3.1.0.5208 Failure to load Add-on to SQL Server 2008 R2
This is actually a defect in the product. After upgrading to 3.1.0.5208 of the SQL Source Control, the Add-On for SQL Server 2008 R2 no longer loads. I had to revert to using 3.0.13.4214
4 votes -
Use windows username instead of disaply name for linking to TFS 2012
I am unable to link databases to TFS 2012 due to our parent company enforcing a Active Directory display name of "LastName, FirstName" which TFS claims is invalid due to the comma.
It is a known issue with TFS (http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/768112/tfs-2012-build-failing-with-tf10158-user-name-contains-unsupported-characters)
The workaround listed on Microsoft Connect is to use "domain\username" instead of display name when sending commands to TFS. Unfortunately, SQL Source Control doesn't expose a way to do this currently.
8 votes -
Rife with Out of Memory Exceptions.
So, I install the tool to use with a real-world database of 1GB. And all I get are Out-of-Memory exceptions when trying to add data. Or even just run the tool. This is one of the worst software experiences that I've ever had!
Did I just get a buggy version? 3.0.13.4214
12 votes
- Don't see your idea?