Skip to content
← Customer Feedback for Redgate

Settings and activity

43 results found

  1. Indication of current server / database in source control pane would be useful

    27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) commented  · 

    Good point! Waiting to see if there are any more comments/votes on this...

  2. when unlinking a database, ask about files in source control

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) commented  · 

    We currently leave all the files in the source control repository. If you don't want the files, you currently have to delete them from your source control system manually, which is an extra step. What do other people think? Would you like this option in SQL Source Control?

  3. Support source control integration with SSMS Solutions/Projects

    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) commented  · 

    That makes sense! I understand why you suggested svn:ignore now. :-) Would you prefer one over the other (svn:ignore vs supporting SSMS solutions)? We'll have to think about this some more...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) commented  · 

    The whole idea behind SQL Source Control is to allow db developers to work directly on their db objects. All you have to do is right-click on a stored procedure, modify, and execute this in SSMS. Once you have tested it and are happy, then you commit this to Subversion. There's no need to save the file anymore. Would having SQL Source Control replace SSMS solutions?

1 3 Next →