Skip to content
← Customer Feedback for Redgate

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. Add preemptive error checking

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shmuel Tannenbaum commented  · 

    David, thanks for clarifying. Just as an aside, it would also be nice if in general if the RG check-in experience is as similar as possible to the one from Visual Studio. For example: It would be nice if I can enforce the same check-in policies as in TFS.
    Anyway thank you again for your help!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shmuel Tannenbaum commented  · 

    Just to clarify, do you think this will be implemented just not in the near future, or it won't be at all? Because RG Support emailed me that they escalated this feature request to development.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shmuel Tannenbaum commented  · 

    I really appreciate that you are following up on this.
    Yes, these are all good suggestions and I am aware of them. SQL Connect is not an option for some of us here, as we spend most of our day in SSMS, which is the natural place for DB development and which is why we went with RG to begin with (MS has DB projects for VS development). The Find invalid Objects is a great feature and we definitely use it, but again, I would like to know that my database has a bullet proof protection at any given time, without having to rely on people not to forget...I was told by the Support team that this request is being escalated to the development team. Are you saying you think it'll be rejected for the time being? Just wondering out loud, isn’t it just a matter of applying the find invalid objects to the Check-in (and allow it to be optional)?
    Thanks again for all your great comments.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shmuel Tannenbaum commented  · 

    Yes that's true, good point. But let me ask you this: can CI be triggered by developers commiting SQL code in SSMS, using SSC? doesn't CI only get triggered by code checked-in in visual studio?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shmuel Tannenbaum commented  · 

    Well, how would TFS "build" the database? To the best of my knowledge It only knows how to compile code, not sql code, unless you are using Visual Studio SQL project. But I'm not, I'm using Redgate's... Am I missing something obvious here?

    Shmuel Tannenbaum shared this idea  ·