Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Just to raise a concern about performance issues caused by making the changes suggested by PE019...as expressed at https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/94413-sql-prompt/suggestions/40116010-remove-pe019-consider-using-exists-instead-of-in

  2. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  SQL Prompt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Our standards prevent us using meaningless acronyms (e.g. does "C" mean "Customer" or "Case"?), so I cannot support this idea. However, if you were to make this more flexible, e.g. to support this request... https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/94413-sql-prompt/suggestions/1409785-table-name-as-alias then it would definitely have backing from me (and probably others).