Skip to content
← Customer Feedback for Redgate

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. SQL Source Control Static Views (or Table Subsets using WHERE clause)

    636 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    30 comments  ·  SQL Source Control » Static Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    under review  ·  Kendra responded

    Hi everyone. I have merged some User Voice items on this topic of “filtered” static data, as there was significant overlap. I want to share our current guidance on handling scenarios where you need to version a subset of the columns and/or rows in the table.

    With SQL Source control, the best option at this point is to use a post-deployment script for this purpose.

    SQL Source Control introduced pre- and post- scripts in v6.3.

    A post-deployment script gives you a good amount of flexibility over exactly which rows or columns of data you want to include in your project. Example post-deployment scripts for static data are here: https://documentation.red-gate.com/soc7/common-tasks/working-with-pre-post-deployment-scripts/static-data

    If you make heavy use of Static Data, we have stronger support for this in SQL Change Automation.

    SQL Change Automation:

    • Supports column filtered static data tables in the SCA plugin in SSMS
    • Supports multiple post-deployment scripts, in case there is…
    Chattabaugh supported this idea  · 

  2. Allow saving default filters

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Chattabaugh shared this idea  · 

  3. Connect same database to multiple branches

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SQL Source Control » Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chattabaugh commented  · 

    Link database to source control takes over 20 minutes of a DB with 3000 objects (mostly SPs)

    Clicking on Commit Changes to Source Control can take equally as long or longer

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chattabaugh commented  · 

    We have shared development environments that can be used by multiple projects at the same time. When someone works on more than one project they must unlink and link Source control to the different branches. The Process can take upwards of 20-30 minutes to link some of our databases.

    Chattabaugh shared this idea  · 

  4. Improved object merge support - Provide ability to merge a conflicted object, instead of just Keep Mine or Take Theirs

    131 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  20 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Chattabaugh supported this idea  · 

  5. Support SVN "Id" keyword

    89 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    We’re currently not planning to support this for v1. Would you be ok to remove the $id$ keyword for now?

    We’ll have to see how many votes this suggestion gets…

    Internal reference number: SOC-113

  6. Cache SVN and DB Status

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close