Skip to content

Settings and activity

5 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If groups are doing unit tests with tSQLt I almost think it would be necessary to have the option to keep database comparison options local and not required to update to or from. Maybe the option to keep the ignore tsqlt to local...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes this has caused us some trouble as we have some developers working on another copy of the database (i.e. locally) while doing tSQLt unit testing. If they change the options to show tsqlt objects then the other users on the shared database have to view the tsqlt options which are not on the shared database and so it wants them to drop them. In past verisons we were able to sync the options from source control if we wanted or leave them specific to the task on a local database. It would be most appreciated if we were not forced to check in or get the latest database comparison options when changes exist. thanks.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 43 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  DLM Dashboard  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  DLM Dashboard  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 158 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  DLM Dashboard » Version Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes this would be a great compliment to our current CI/Deployment process and a great go to place for our daily deployment reviews and scheduling.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SQL Source Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have recently had the same problem and it is holding up the addition of one of our projects due to this error in our deployment process. Is there an update on this fix?

    Anonymous supported this idea  ·