Skip to content

Settings and activity

8 results found

  1. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
  2. 189 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
  3. 210 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
  4. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
  5. 76 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Simon commented  · 

    It would be quite nice to be able to specify a database level to validate against too. For example 2008 needs semi-colons before CTEs but 2005 doesn't.
    Sometimes when moving a database between servers I first ensure there are no invalid objects that will prevent SQL Compare from being able to generate the new database, currently I have to run SQL Compare, find an issue and fix it then repeat until there are no more issues. If Find Invalid Objects could detect those 'potentially invalid objects' that would be good

  7. 125 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Simon commented  · 

    This provides a great way to standardise code styles; trying to clean up a legacy database prior to adding it to Source Control could be a monumental task, but if the option were there to automatically apply the rules in SQL Prompt (which ideally would already be shared by the developers anyway) would mean the entire code base could easily be standardised.

    It's 'one less thing to have to remember' too.

    Simon supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Simon commented  · 

    I am using Mercurial and this is an issue for me too

    Simon supported this idea  ·