Skip to content

Settings and activity

4 results found

  1. 68 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon Barnes supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Simon Barnes commented  · 

    Be even better if MS deprecated them :p

  2. 105 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SQL Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon Barnes supported this idea  · 
  3. 89 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SQL Compare  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon Barnes supported this idea  · 
  4. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Simon Barnes supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Simon Barnes commented  · 

    +2 for this, except mine relates to SQL Compare (as I believe SSC uses the Compare libraries this shouldn't make a difference). For me a really annoying factor is that it's used as part of a default constraint and as such apparently can't be excluded via filters.