Skip to content

Settings and activity

6 results found

  1. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I fully agree, this is very annyoing - just have a look onto the attached screenshot (I just added a 4 columns (ok) plus their MS_Descriptions and the whole compare becomes an unreadable mess

    maybe it would already help, if you change the syntax in your created scripts to
    EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty @name = N'MS_DESCRIPTION', @level0type = N'SCHEMA', @level0name = N'schema', @level1type = N'TABLE', @level1name = N'table', @level2type = N'COLUMN', @level2name = N'column', @value = '<column description>' ;
    (name the parameters and move the @value to the end of the line).

    Or use a logic similar to the logic for static data (there you are able to identify new / changed / deleted / equal rows). As primary key you could use the object_name + column_name (maybe not the id (except force column order is enabled), it is more likely that you have the the columns in the wrong order than that you rename columns).

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  SQL Prompt  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  ·