Settings and activity
93 results found
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment @philcart - any chance of emailing the screenshots to david dot atkinson at red-gate.com? We've discussed a concept of red indicators (like the blue ones) which will appear on the Object Explorer tree when we detect a more recent version in source control. Is this what you had in mind?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment @Shaila - we have an older version of SQL Source Control that works with VSS but we aren't actively developing this. Microsoft's end-of-life plans are well underway, and therefore it doesn't make sense for development resource to be invested in a soon-to-be-deprecated technology. What newer source control system will you be moving to?
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment @Stephen - Are you hoping to just use the external diffing tool to view the differences, or are you expecting this to support more complex operations such as merges?
An error occurred while saving the comment Out of interest, which external diff viewers would you want to use?
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Would this effectively be equivalent to unlinking, re-linking to the new tag, and taking you to the get latest tab?
-
5 votes
In v2.2, which is expected to be released in the next few weeks, we’ve implemented Object Filtering, which allows you to specify which objects to inlcude/exclude for source control. Therefore, you could link a database and set up a filter so that only the tables/procedures your interested in for your project would be source controlled. Would this help?
You can get the v2.2 Release Candidate at http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?t=13668 to try this out.An error occurred while saving the comment @Afroz - have you considered creating two branches in source control, one for each project, or wouldn't this work for you?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Are you asking for a simpler way to unlink and relink between repositories, which maybe remembers both of your URLs so you don't have to type them back in again?
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment @Chattabaugh - Thanks for the feedback. Which part of the process of linking takes 20-30 minutes?
An error occurred while saving the comment Is there any reason why multiple databases can't be set up, each linking to a different branch?
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment We're adding support that will allow you to specify command line parameters for your given source control system. This will be available in the next early access release. The drawback is that you'll have to use your own source control tools to view an object's history, rather than the one we've integrated into SSMS. But committing and getting should work fine. If you're on the EA list you'll be notified of this build in the coming weeks.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks for the clarification. I'd be interested in other users' comments on this topic. If it's useful we could in theory allow multiple configured links, and let the user toggle between them.
An error occurred while saving the comment Could you please elaborate a little more on why it isn't convenient to unlink/relink?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes, this is less than ideal and it's on our backlog to ensure that only the objects pertaining to the selected version were checked. Expect to see this in a future release of the SSMS Integration Pack.
-
2 votes
SQL Prompt 5 (expected in Dec 2010 or Jan 2011) will have a feature to find invalid objects. You can get information about current early access releases at http://www.red-gate.com/messageboard/viewforum.php?f=127.
An error occurred while saving the comment Interestingly, this is a feature that is making it into the upcoming SQL Prompt 5 (you can sign up to the early access program to try it out), but it seems like a good idea to have something similar as a pre-commit check in SQL Source Control.
-
3 votes
Please see SQL Prompt 5 at: http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=11980
An error occurred while saving the comment SQL Source Control doesn't do this, but SQL Prompt 5 has a feature that lets you hover over an object in the Query Window and view the column dependencies. More details on SQL Prompt 5 here: http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=11980
@Greg - this is for DDL triggers. As a DML trigger is dependent on its parent table, it was deemed appropriate to keep them together. However, there are many reasons why it makes sense to separate them, so it's something we'll be considering going forward.