Settings and activity
27 results found
-
4 votes
Stephen
shared this idea
·
-
13 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Thanks for the query, Daniel. Very helpful in detecting objects with now-non-existent object references, and inefficient scalar-function usages. Worth the 42 seconds it takes to run.
Cheers!
-
8 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
I'd appreciate the RECOMPARE, too. Wouldn't necessarily always want source AND static data recompared, so if that could be an option, please.
Stephen
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Drop down would be a good start. It would also help if we could swap servers, too. I have three distinct products with servers located in three distant states, each with their own SVN repository, so changing to a connected server AND database attracts my remaining 1 vote.
I TOTALLY agree with Ludvig's comment about preventing interference with multitasking. SQL Search, SC, SSMS query editors, et al, should all be, as it were, in their own protected environment, if MS makes that possible, of course...
Stephen
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Long wanted this simple Diff capability. Have to, like Ludvig, save to files and use Notepad++'s Compare Add-in. There's a Diff detector in SQL Compare and Source Control - how hard could it be to port as an add-in, especially now you have the framework in place in SSMS...?
Stephen
supported this idea
·
-
150 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
55 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Another scenario, possibly: SQL Multi Script enables definition of a set of servers in a "family". I have three different sets defined for each nigh on completely distinct application. Would you consider extending "defined server groups" into SQL Search so that when we have selected particular databases for our search and switch to another server in the same group, DON'T swap to the default database, DO perform the same search on the same set of selected databases, bypassing any databases(s) not yet on, for example, QA or Production. I frequently want to see a Search on databases A and B on Dev, then compare that against either QA or Production for the same databases, but as my default is always master, must go about selecting db's again. Any chance you'd consider this, RG? You very kindly whacked the advert banner for paying customers, so you could probably make this a paid-customer-only feature... Thanks for any consideration.
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
This is also VERY applicable to the OnTime integration with SVN where at checkin, an additional ticket-search control is added to the standard TortoiseSVN UI.
We are prevented from adopting OnTime due to the lack of any ability to inform OnTime of a commit or be able to look up ticket numbers via some SSC integration.
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Does this VS Gallery replacement fit the bill for the untabify need? http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f5d2ff29-cf19-4762-b4cc-01cefbbbb471
-
131 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
+1 for UDFs and triggers, not just SPs, please.
-
45 votesStephen
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
For those with huge numbers of either databases or objects, please consider this an OPTION, RG. Thanks.
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Up to SQL2008R2 use the free http://www.ssmstoolspack.com/ and you can script a resultset to INSERTs and search it, too. SQL2012 = $$$
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Stephen
commented
Strange!
I'm also using 3.0.13.4214 within SSMS 2008 R2 and the database clearly shows just above the "Commit" button at top-right, just below the redgate logo for SSC. Win2003R2SP2
It would assist if you'd add the SSMS and OS versions to your post.
-
341 votes
If the generated definition could include NOT NULL as appropriate, as against the SELECT INTO making every column NULL, that would help a lot.