78 results found
-
0 votes
I am closing this request as it was raised in 2011 and has zero votes.
-
support for SQL Compact Edition in SQL Compare
Increasingly, developers will be using the latest version of SQL Compact Edition to do local development, and want to use SQL Compare to generate an update script for the server.
41 votesThis request is in the wrong Uservoice forum. Please could you re-submit it to the SQL Compare Uservoice forum: https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/141379-sql-compare
-
linking static data doesn't show changes in commit tab
This is more a bug than suggestion. I'm using SQL SC 2.0.3.13 against VSS 8.0.50727.42.
Apparently, checking tables to be linked is having no effect except that the same tables are checked when I return to the link data screen. Nothing appears in the commit tab.1 voteThis should work if you are using SQL 2005 or above. Please vote on http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/456019-support-sql-server-2000 if you need 2000 support.
-
Changing default source control server in Link Database to Source Control
We have migrated to a new server. Everytime I want to link a DB to source control, the old server comes up as the default in the screen "Link Database to Source Control". How can I change this default behaviour?
1 voteIf you are using SVN, then you can clear your URL history in TSVN Settings > Saved Data.
-
Auto-init new Mercurial repository
Currently during the link procedure if I just create a new folder and point to that the link will fail with "abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!" what is fair enough (and "Open Command Prompt..." helps a lot) but I think it would be great it SQL Source Control can automatically resolve this by creating a repo on its own.
0 votesI am closing this request as it was raised in 2011 and has zero votes.
-
Kindel/Books integration
Since we (DBA/DEV types) have either a load of SQL books floating about, as well as book marks into good SQL sites. We also use the snipets manager in SQL Prompt it would make sense for there to be a connection to bookmarks in books/websites as we use intellisense or snipetts. Likewise have a postback to the forum of 'good bits' into the Snippets repository. From the respository we need an RSS feed on new stuff.
1 voteThis is a SQL Prompt feature request. If it’s still relevant, please add it as a suggestion in the SQL Prompt uservoice forum at https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/94413-sql-prompt
-
Allow me to sort the history by clicking on the column header (author, comment, etc.)
If you look at the history to select a specific version it could be useful to make the grid sortable (on version, date,author,comment DESC/ASC) .
Then we could sort based on the comment, this would allow to search for specific '5.1' tag or 4.2 tag..
0 votesClosing this request since it has been open for 6 years and has zero votes.
-
Error: Transaction context in use by another session
My setup went smoothly. I create a new sp on datatabase server, "Comit Changes" then I can see it in TFS. I run into error when I modified the sp from TFS, then go to SQL Source Control and do try to "get Latest". First I got error MSDTC not available, I then started MSDTC services, now i got different error "Transaction context in use by another session". Can you help?
18 votesGiven the age of this request, I’m assuming that you either managed to get things working, or gave up. I’m very sorry we didn’t respond earlier, but if by any chance you’re still struggling with this, please contact support@red-gate.com and they’ll be able to help.
-
4 votes
We believe this needs to be setup on your source control system and not on the SQL Source Control client.
For SVN users, configure a pre-commit hook to require comments.
For TFS users, this would be done through a policy, but we currently ignore these. If this is something you would like, please vote/comment at http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/726952-evaluate-tfs-policies-when-committing-db-changes.
Thank you!
Stephanie Herr :-)
SQL Source Control Project Manager -
Make connected database more obvious in UI
Because this product can execute DB changes in bulk, it is essential to highlight clearly the connected database (particularly if it is a Production instance!).
1 voteWe do NOT recommend linking production databases to source control. Changes should be made on your development instance that is linked to source control. These changes should be deployed to your other environments (Test > Staging > Production) using SQL Compare.
FYI – Have you heard about our NEW SSMS Integration Pack, http://www.red-gate.com/products/ssms_integration_pack? If you have SQL Compare, this is a free tool that allows you to deploy changes quickly from SSMS.
If you want, you can comment/vote on the following suggestion:
Indication of current server / database in source control pane would be useful, http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/464497-indication-of-current-server-database-in-source- -
Two databases linked to same image, not synch'ed
Have the same db on multiple servers. Updated it on one, when to the others, not showing as different even after refresh.
1 voteI’ve added a new suggestion for this (http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/1154535-notification-that-you-are-out-of-date-as-other-use) – currently, you need to go to “Get Latest” to see changes.
-
Modify comments in history
Displaying the History is awesome, but it would be nice to be able to modify the comments right there in the history window.
9 votesYou'll have to do this in your source control system.
-
able to see the history and do a compare between two versions in the repository
It would be awesome to be able to see the history and do a compare between two versions in the repository.
5 votesThis suggestion is talking about 2 features.
For history, please vote/comment at
https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/471982-svn-show-log-tfs-view-history-?ref=titleFor comparing 2 versions, please vote/comment at
https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/491523-diff-or-compare-versions-of-an-object?ref=title -
Use sys.objects create/modify date to get new changes quicker
Using sys.objects you could determine objects which have been created/modified since the last check to speed things up
12 votes -
v1.0.1.13 hangs on commit to TFS source control
Trying to commit large number of changed objects to source control causes complete hang of RG Source and SSMS. I have to halt SSMS in Task Manager, and none of my changes are committed. The same TFS, SQL Server, and db are accessible and usable via other SQL Source integration (ApexSQL Edit and VS2010). Only difference is a different local and TFS path for our RG testing. Otherwise this should work.
3 votesDid you have this problem with previous versions? Please get in touch with support@red-gate.com if you are still experiencing this problem.
We have seen this problem caused by interactions with some other software… Do you have any of the following installed on your machine?
- Microsoft Security Essentials
- Windows Indexing Service
- Virus scanners
- Anti Trojan softwareIf so, could you make sure they are excluding our directory
C:\Documents and Settings\\Local Settings\Application Data\Red Gate\Logs\SQL Source Control
or
C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Red Gate\Logs\SQL Source ControlPlease let us know if excluding this directory fixes the issue.
-
Modifying a table makes it disappear from the tables list
Whenever I modify an existing table, the table disappears from the Object Explorer. If I refresh the tables list in the Object Explorer it reappears...but c'mon, that's ridiculous. The only thing you should be doing to the Object Explorer is marking items that have been modified. If you want to help here, then refresh the list when I add something so it appears (something Microsoft never implemented).
Note: this only happens when you FIRST edit a table (i.e. subsequent edits to the table after your modified icon is on the table icon don't cause this issue).
14 votesWe have attempted to fix this behaviour a few times now – if it’s still occurring, we would like to investigate this as a bug rather than a feature request. If you have seen this recently, can you please email support@red-gate.com with details?
-
View change history (TFS) on a per entity basis within Management Studio, with selective rollback
I understand the difficulties that would exist with rolling back to previous versions of tables based on changes that may have occurred to data, relationships, etc., and rolling back sprocs/functions would have similar potential consequences. But being able to view a change history per entity and have the option to revert has got to make it into the feature pipeline if it's not already...
3 votesPlease vote for the following:
Viewing History – https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/471982-svn-show-log-tfs-view-history-?ref=title
Get Specific Version –
https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/492431-get-specific-version-from-source-control-svn-upd?ref=title -
option to lock objects instead of creating new versions
Using TFS as source control, when more than one person is working on the same object (procedure) it causes multiple files to be created. Would like an option to resolve conflicts instead of creating additional versions in the source control.
0 votesPlease contact support@red-gate.com if you have this problem.
-
Support for other VS Compliant Source Code Systems? I use SourceGear Fortress...
Why don't you pull from the registry's list of currently installed SCC providers instead of using only Subversion and TFS? If the SCC provider is VS compliant, then why not?
3 votesPlease vote for specific source control systems at https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/category/6301-additional-source-control-support.
-
Initializing of static table content
Initializing of static table content, ie global options, tables which contain type information
1 voteI do not understand this suggestion. Are you looking to source control the contents of a table? E.g., static, reference or lookup table content. If so, please vote/comment on this suggestion, http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/457874-source-control-data-data-folder-is-blank-?ref=title, which also explains the workaround for using SQL Data Compare Pro to do this until we implement this in SQL Source Control.
- Don't see your idea?