588 results found

1. Make it obvious if there any "Get latest" items

   When the SQL Source Control tab refreshes, it would be exceedingly useful to see if there are any items under the "Get latest" tab without having to go into the tab.

   I would suggest adding the number of changes in the tab to the tab title. For example...

   _/ Commit changes (12) _/ Get latest (2) _.....

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Allow migration script to be added even if I don't want to check in all dependant objects

   When I try to create a migration script on a (not yet checked in) object, and that object has a dependency on another object, then SQL Source Control requires that I add the dependent objects to the migration script and the subsequent checkin. SQL Source control is correct that there's a SQL-level dependency between the two objects, but as a developer, I can tell that it's safe to check in one without the other.

   As a workaround, if I checkin the change first without the migration script, SQL Source Control suggests that I also checkin the dependent objects, but doesn't require it. I can then add a migration script to the already-checked-in change.

   I'd like to avoid using this workaround and be able to directly add a migration script and not include dependent objects.

   When I try to create a migration script on a (not yet checked in) object, and that object has a dependency on another object, then SQL Source Control requires that I add the dependent objects to the migration script and the subsequent checkin. SQL Source control is correct that there's a SQL-level dependency between the two objects, but as a developer, I can tell that it's safe to check in one without the other.

   As a workaround, if I checkin the change first without the migration script, SQL Source Control suggests that I also checkin the dependent objects, but doesn't … more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. I am allowed to commit previous changes that upon refresh would show newer changes. Can there be a check for this on commit?

   I want a check on commit for all the items I intend to check in to make sure that there is not a newer version available. In the case where there is, I want to be presented with a list of those changes for review before anything is committed.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Support different static data per customer

   I have a single schema for all customers but different reference data for different customers. It would be nice if I could manage this all within SQL Source Control. This should also be understood by SQL Compare and my continuous integration system when it comes time to deploy this to my different environments and customers' sites.

   254 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   6 comments  ·  Static Data  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  Kendra responded

   Hi all. Thank you for your votes and feedback on this issue over the years. Here is our current guidance for this suggestion:

   Post-deployment scripts give you flexibility for static data

   With SQL Source Control, you can now use a post-deployment script to “dynamically” deploy static data based on a factor such as @@SERVERNAME or other query-able conditions.

   SQL Source Control introduced pre- and post- scripts in v6.3.

   An example post-deployment script which shows how to control deployment of static data by environment is here: https://documentation.red-gate.com/soc7/common-tasks/working-with-pre-post-deployment-scripts/static-data

   If you make heavy use of Static Data, we have stronger support for this in SQL Change Automation.

   SQL Change Automation:

   • Supports column filtered static data tables in the SCA plugin in SSMS
     Supports multiple post-deployment scripts, in case there is a preference to manage static data tables in dedicated post-deployment scripts
   • Allows approaches like bulk loading larger static data tables by supporting SQLCMD variables in migration and post-deployment scripts

   If there are other use cases where a migrations approach would add value to the team – such as easily being able to run data modification statements as part of deployments, or being able to customize the TSQL for schema changes – then changing from SQL Source Control to SQL Change Automation makes sense.

   Hi all. Thank you for your votes and feedback on this issue over the years. Here is our current guidance for this suggestion:

   Post-deployment scripts give you flexibility for static data

   With SQL Source Control, you can now use a post-deployment script to “dynamically” deploy static data based on a factor such as @@SERVERNAME or other query-able conditions.

   SQL Source Control introduced pre- and post- scripts in v6.3.

   An example post-deployment script which shows how to control deployment of static data by environment is here: https://documentation.red-gate.com/soc7/common-tasks/working-with-pre-post-deployment-scripts/static-data

   If you make heavy use of Static Data, we have stronger support for this in SQL Change Automation.

   SQL Change Automation:

   • Supports column filtered static data tables in the SCA plugin in SSMS
     Supports multiple post-deployment scripts, in case there is a preference to manage static data tables in dedicated post-deployment scripts
   • Allows approaches like bulk loading larger static data tables by supporting SQLCMD… more

5. run stored procedure before/after commit before/after get

   Make a function where you could setup a before/after Commit and before/after Get stored procedure which will be executed automatically.

   In my case I backup the Database diagrams to table with a stored procedure. I would like to run it before every commit. The restore sp could be run after a get

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. It would be great to use Source Control with Postgres
   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Allow the re-ordering of columns via drag and drop in the commit changes grid
   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Search Results in Grid Mode

   I still have SSMS Tools Pack installed because of one useful feature that I have not seen in Red-Gate's products. Search Results in Grid Mode. Find all occurrences of your search string in the results in datagrid mode.

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. When tables with linked data are renamed, the new tables do not have linked data

   Linked data settings should be remembered when a table is renamed

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Static Data  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Pending Changes Report

    A tool/report that will list all pending changes you have over all databases in a server, currently you have to go through each database one by one seeing if there are any changes

    45 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Please make your software more tolerant of slow internet connections with long latencies - like satellite connections.

    Please make your software more tolerant of slow internet connections with long latencies - like satellite connections.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Clone db from server to other server

    Clone db from server a tomserver b without genarating a bk file
    Direct bk restor without generating file
    This alow to save time and space

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  History/Log  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. sql source control window resizing

    When resizing SSMS, the SQL Source Control window does not resize correctly. Some UI elements appear on top of others. Not a major issue but is likely not working as expected.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Buggy feature with Mercurial, maybe other source control systems too.

    When I update to a node in a branch that is not the head of the branch, for instance to rollback my database to a previous tag. The moment I hit the get latest tab in SQL Source Control, it automatically updates to the head of my branch, making it impossible to revert to a previous version.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. get latest from source control - dependencies

    After you click the "Get Latest" button, while the "Determining schema changes" step is processing, there is a dialog that will sometimes pop up that says "Get latest from source control - dependencies". The "affected objects" list does not include the schema name for these objects. For databases that make heavy use of schema names, the schema name is critical to display here.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Exclude/Include filter not working as expected, SLOW performance

    we have 13000 objects in our database.
    12800 of them are all in the dbo schema which contains the standard logic for our product.
    The rest 200 are in the customer specific schema.
    We are not interested in source controlling the standard logic, since we get it from our supplier.
    We need to source control our customer specific changes. For that every change is made in another schema.
    We can perfectly filter the objects out for source control with your tool.
    (so they do not appear on the commit screen). However it is very very slow, that's why I suspected the tool not to filter the objects "server-side"

    I started a profler session and my suspicion was confirmed: the tool is getting all objects and then filters the rows "client-side".
    So first getting 13000 objects to not use 12800 of them. It is also using a lot of memory (after 2 hours we get memory exceptions).
    Could you please change this? Now I'm trying to convince the team to use those tools (I used them on smaller projects).
    But with this speed, they won't agree.
    Here the queries I catched when opening commit tab with filter on:

    SELECT so.name AS TableName,
    ss.name AS TableOwner,
    cc.name AS ConstraintName,
    cc.objectid AS Constraintid,
    cc.isnotforreplication AS NotForReplication,
    cc.isnottrusted AS WithNoCheck,
    cc.isdisabled AS Disabled,
    sc.name AS ColumnName,
    cc.parentcolumnid AS colid,
    cc.definition AS Text,
    CONVERT(bit, CASE cc.issystemnamed WHEN 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) As issystemnamed
    FROM sys.checkconstraints cc WITH (NOLOCK)
    INNER JOIN sys.objects so WITH (NOLOCK) ON so.objectid=cc.parentobjectid
    LEFT JOIN sys.schemas ss WITH (NOLOCK) ON ss.schemaid=so.schemaid
    LEFT JOIN sys.columns sc WITH (NOLOCK) ON sc.columnid=cc.parentcolumnid AND sc.objectid=cc.parentobjectid
    ORDER BY so.name, cc.name

    SELECT s.name AS ProcedureName,
    p.name AS ProcedureOwner,
    ss.name AS SchemaName,
    s.objectid AS id,
    CONVERT(bit, ISNULL(sm.isschemabound,0)) AS SchemaBound,
    CONVERT(bit, ISNULL(sm.usesansinulls, 0)) AS AnsiNulls,
    CONVERT(bit, ISNULL(sm.usesquotedidentifier,0)) AS QuotedIdentifier,
    s.type AS ProcedureType,
    am.assemblyclass,
    am.assemblymethod,
    CASE WHEN am.nullonnullinput IS NULL THEN sm.nullonnullinput ELSE am.nullonnullinput END AS nullonnullinput,
    COALESCE(p2.name,p3.name) AS executeas,
    CONVERT(bit, COALESCE(
    CASE WHEN am.executeasprincipalid = -2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
    CASE WHEN sm.executeasprincipalid = -2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)) AS executeasowner,
    a.name AS assembly,
    case when sm.definition is null THEN CONVERT(bit, 1) else CONVERT(bit, 0) END AS encrypted

    FROM sys.objects s WITH (NOLOCK)
    LEFT JOIN sys.databaseprincipals p WITH (NOLOCK) ON p.principalid=s.principalid
    LEFT JOIN sys.schemas ss WITH (NOLOCK) ON ss.schemaid=s.schemaid
    LEFT JOIN sys.sqlmodules sm WITH (NOLOCK) ON sm.objectid=s.objectid
    LEFT JOIN sys.assemblymodules am WITH (NOLOCK) ON am.objectid=s.objectid
    LEFT JOIN sys.assemblies a WITH (NOLOCK) ON a.assemblyid=am.assemblyid
    LEFT JOIN sys.databaseprincipals p2 WITH (NOLOCK) ON p2.principalid=am.executeasprincipalid
    LEFT JOIN sys.databaseprincipals p3 WITH (NOLOCK) ON p3.principalid=sm.executeasprincipalid
    WHERE s.type IN (N'P', N'PC') AND
    (CAST(CASE WHEN s.ismsshipped = 1 then 1
    WHEN (SELECT majorid FROM sys.extendedproperties WHERE
    majorid = s.objectid AND minorid = 0 AND class = 1 AND
    name = N'microsoftdatabasetools_support') IS NOT NULL THEN 1
    ELSE 0
    END AS bit)=0)

    we have 13000 objects in our database.
    12800 of them are all in the dbo schema which contains the standard logic for our product.
    The rest 200 are in the customer specific schema.
    We are not interested in source controlling the standard logic, since we get it from our supplier.
    We need to source control our customer specific changes. For that every change is made in another schema.
    We can perfectly filter the objects out for source control with your tool.
    (so they do not appear on the commit screen). However it is very very slow, that's why I suspected… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Cannot Get Latest

    Everytime I try to Get Latest I get the following....

    System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts ---> System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts
    at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.LinkedDatabase.GetDatabaseFolderWorkspaces(ICancellableOperationStatus status, IScriptFolderStructure scriptFolderStructure, IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks callBacks, SourceControlRevision& revision)
    at #GWeb.#WXM.#Fieb()
    at #GWeb.#Wheb.#tieb(Func1 )
at #GWeb.#WXM.#8ZW(Boolean )
at #GWeb.#XXM.#yRW()
at #GWeb.#WXM.#qYM()
at #GWeb.#XXM.#iS()
at #qlhb.#0heb.#l36(String , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus )
at #qlhb.#K3c.#83c(String , #O9U , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#A3.#eL5b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#jzb.#Qnw()
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#VAb.#xSXc()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#uz2b(String , IDatabaseConnection , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action )
at #qlhb.#0heb.#wieb(IBoundDatabase , ICompareOptions , Boolean , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action )
at #GWeb.#VXM.#mYM[#NrPb](IBoundDatabase , Func2 , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector , Action )
    at #GWeb.#VXM.#kYM(IBoundDatabase , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector )
    at #GWeb.#4Ec.#8Jc(ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector )
    at #GWeb.#4Ec.#izb.#SB7b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
    at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.MutexedCancellableOperation1.#u3.#k5f()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.CancellableOperationBase.InvokeWithTracker(String featureUsageKey, Action action)
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.MutexedCancellableOperation1.Invoke()
    at #eEc.#Qlg.Invoke()
    at #JLc.#PLc.#Jfb.#EJf()
    at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.SmartAssembly.ExceptionReporting.ErrorReporterBase.Do(Action , Predicate1 , Boolean )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.SmartAssembly.ExceptionReporting.ErrorReporterBase.DoWithObviousExceptionsRethrowAll(Action action)
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.CommonUI.Forms.ErrorDialog.DoWithObviousExceptionsRethrowAll(Action action)
at #JLc.#PLc.#CTc(ICancellableOperation1 , Object )

    Everytime I try to Get Latest I get the following....

    System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts ---> System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts
    at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.LinkedDatabase.GetDatabaseFolderWorkspaces(ICancellableOperationStatus status, IScriptFolderStructure scriptFolderStructure, IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks callBacks, SourceControlRevision& revision)
    at #GWeb.#WXM.#Fieb()
    at #GWeb.#Wheb.#tieb(Func1 )
at #GWeb.#WXM.#8ZW(Boolean )
at #GWeb.#XXM.#yRW()
at #GWeb.#WXM.#qYM()
at #GWeb.#XXM.#iS()
at #qlhb.#0heb.#l36(String , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus )
at #qlhb.#K3c.#83c(String , #O9U , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#A3.#eL5b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#jzb.#Qnw()
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#VAb.#xSXc()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#uz2b(String , IDatabaseConnection , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. For shared development environment, replace "GET ALL" with list of historical changes made

    When developing in shared enviroment, I'd love a history tab that I can review all revisions with details, and not have to have a modal window separately. I believe this should be integrated into the main source control tab as change history log. This could help make others aware of changes made that could affect them, yet were already committed. Thanks!

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. When opening SSMS show all databases with differences in the Object Explorer view without having to select each individual database

    When opening SSMS highlight all databases with uncommitted changes in the Object Explorer view without having to select each individual database.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. On conflict when commiting changes able to right click and open proc/table in new sql editor

    When you get conflict when commiting changes it would be nice to be able to right click and open proc/table in new sql editor, do you change (merge) and continue.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close