Skip to content

Oracle

Welcome to our Oracle solution feature suggestion site. Find out more information about our current offering at www.redgate.com/oracle.

If you have any questions, need help, or have found a bug, please visit the forums at forum.red-gate.com/categories/oracle-tools.

Oracle

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

26 results found

  1. 179 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    This is now available in the final v3 release of Source Control for Oracle – available now

  2. Some tables are metatables involving data/information connected to the software releases. The Source Control utility should have a possibility of setting a switch on the tables, turning data compare on. This way you could include data for these tables in the version control.

    131 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Doerte responded

    We just released static data support for Source Control for Oracle.

  3. Allow us to specify options (like in Schema Compare for Oracle) when creating a Source Control for Oracle project (e.g. we'd like to include storage clauses in the table create scripts)

    Note from Red Gate: If you vote on this feature request, it would also be helpful to know what options specifically you'd like to see.

    47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    Storage options are now available in the latest release of the tools.

    There are a number of new “Include ..” storage options available in both the Schema Compare and Source Control tools.

    To get to options in Source Control right click on the project in the start screen and selected “Edit comparison options”.

  4. In our schema(s) there is a mixture of third party code that we don't touch, and our own code where we'll amend and add objects. Please add a way to filter out the third party objects.

    (If you vote on this, please let us know if the objects concerned are named in a particular way that would make filtering easier)

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    This is now available via check for updates or to be downloaded from our website.

    This allows objects to be filtered based on type or substrings (both include and exclude).

  5. When working on an object, we would like to see an option to check-out and/or lock the item it is mapped to in source control. Preferably, we would like this to happen when the item is edited and compiled. Again, this could be an XML config file option of some kind, or an option during check-in to lock the file for the user checking it in.

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    This has been released in the latest versions of Source Control for Oracle. The upcoming release removes the clutter of locking partitons and lobs which can only be modified with the connecting table object.

  6. Our application has public synonyms that should be versioned along with our application, but Source Control for Oracle isn’t picking up the public synonyms that point to objects in our versioned schemas.

    Would it be possible to look for public synonyms whose referenced object is in the list of schemas that are in the SC project? For example, if my project schemas were ‘MYSCHEMA1’ and ‘MYSCHEMA2’, then SC for Oracle would look to version any public synonyms with a query like this:

    SELECT *
    FROM allsynonyms
    WHERE owner = 'PUBLIC'
    AND table
    owner IN ('MYSCHEMA1', 'MY

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When a repository is created from the database, both the package header and the package body are placed in a single file. It would be more usable if the spec and body were in separate files in the same folder with a .pks or .pkb extension respectively.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Neil Anderson responded

    this will be in the next release of Schema Compare and Source Control for Oracle

  8. Generate a script that contains all the synonyms that have been created to support the schema being version controlled.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    I believe this is a request for public synonyms which has been implemented in the latest release.

    Please let me know if that’s incorrect.

  9. We noticed that all objects have a prefix in front of it.
    The prefix happens to be the same as your folder name. I would prefer it if it was the same as the schema name, or NULL. Preferably give us the right to choose a prefix name.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    I believe you can do this in the latest version of Source Control.

    Either you can make your schema name the same as the folder when you setup your project.

    Or you can now access the options via right-click on the project on the projects page and select “Edit comparison options…” and use the option “Exclude schema names”

  10. Now the projects are listed in the order they were created. I would like to be able to sort them manually in a more logical order.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    In the upcoming release (this week hopefully) the projects are sorted by name on startup. Not quite the flexibility you were after but I hope this will satisfy you for now.

    What sorting at startup means is that renaming a project will not move it in the project order until the tool is restarted.

  11. As we have lot of objects in the schema, if we want to lok for a particular object we dont have search capability in the tool

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Richard Mitchell responded

    The latest versions of the tools have a filter capability on the check-in page to search particular objects.

    (just doing a review of all uservoice requests)

  12. Allow for saving of database versioning in a sub-folder of the subversion repository rather than just the root of the repository.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Anonymous responded

    This should now be fixed in the beta released yesterday (21 Feb), please do let us know if there are still issues!

  13. Put a border around the application frame so it's eaier to detect on the screen with 20 other windows open...

    Much more importantly you need to add a way to cycle through the differences in the source control diff window by allowing to move through the changes instead of having to scroll. The blue is very hard to see in the side bar, too. Allowing simple text search wouldn't hurt either.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    There is a border around the application. There’s also a “Previous” and “Next” button at the top of the differences pane near the bottom. This will jump you the Previous/Next difference within the script respectively.

  14. The SID for my oracle instance is 10 characters. The connection wizard only allows 8 characters so can't use the product.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. It would be nice if Source Control for Oracle could support versioning materialized views and materialized view logs.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Neil Anderson responded

    This has been complete in v1.0.0.755 of Source Control for Oracle, available via Help→Check for Updates

  16. It is not generating the UserObjectPrivileges scripts correctly, it is using the folder name of the repository instead of the schema name we are versioning:

    Here is an example:

    GRANT EXECUTE ON "branches/devl/db/devl".function TO user;

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Source Control for Oracle - Please do not run the refresing automatically when the app is openned. Run on demand when user click Reresh.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add support to ORACLELOADER and ORACLEDATAPUMP access drivers to fix some bugs related to external tables (see http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=16543)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. I'm getting an error that TFS client not found. I don't see any documentation as to what the RedGate software is expecting to see as a "TFS client". Please advise.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Anonymous responded

    An alternative to needing Visual Studio installed is to use Team Explorer or Team Explorer Everywhere

  20. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    completed  ·  Anonymous responded

    Thanks Leigh, this should now be the case in the latest beta release

← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?