129 results found

1. Export History of Changes from Source Control for Oracle
   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Exclude system-generated interval partitions from comparison and DDL

   For background on Oracle's interval partitioning feature, see chapter 4 of Oracle Database Concept for release 12.2.

   Our practice is to create interval-partitioned tables with the minimum number of partitions necessary to create the table (usually just one partition), and let Oracle create all others as data arrives requiring them. Between test, QA, and production databases, data arrives at different times, giving rise to automatic creation of different partitions. But because these differences are only a side-effect of different contents, they are not relevant, in the same way that differences in system-generated constraint names are not relevant. Changing the partition key or the interval size would require a rebuild.

   Any time there is a CREATE TABLE command for an interval-partitioned table, the command should be limited to only those partitions that are needed to establish the table. In other words, exclude those partitions where DBATABPARTITIONS.INTERVAL='YES', because they are system-generated. The CREATE TABLE command should explicitly list only those partitions where INTERVAL='NO';

   An an example, I have an interval-partitioned table named FMEMBERTENUREMMSNAPSHOT. These are the partitions in my test database:
   C911233@TCRDS_SACRDSD2R.ssdc.kp.org> l
   1 select partitionname, partitionposition, highvalue, interval
   2 from dbatabpartitions
   3 where tablename='FMEMBERTENUREMMSNAPSHOT'
   4 and tableowner='COBIDM'
   5* order by partitionposition
   C911233@TCRDSSACRDSD2R.ssdc.kp.org> /

   PARTITIONNAME PARTITIONPOSITION HIGH_VALUE INTERVAL

   ---

   PARTEMPTY 1 190001 NO
   SYSP937 2 201310 YES
   SYSP968 3 201311 YES
   SYSP966 4 201312 YES
   SYSP973 5 201313 YES
   SYSP933 6 201402 YES
   SYSP970 7 201403 YES
   SYSP967 8 201404 YES
   SYSP931 9 201405 YES
   SYSP932 10 201406 YES
   SYSP935 11 201407 YES
   SYSP977 12 201408 YES
   <skipping many lines for brevity>
   SYSP3318 63 201811 YES
   SYSP3554 64 201812 YES

   If there is a need to generate a CREATE TABLE command, all I really need is shown below, because it is sufficient to establish the table as indicated by INTERVAL='NO' in the query above:

   CREATE TABLE cobidm.rgtemp11090455980 (
   fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik NUMBER NOT NULL,
   dmbrprmyhrnik NUMBER NOT NULL,
   <many columns omitted>
   crdsprcscntlupdid NUMBER NOT NULL,
   CONSTRAINT RGTEMP11090455981 PRIMARY KEY (fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik) USING INDEX (CREATE UNIQUE INDEX cobidm.rgtemp11090455982 ON cobidm.rgtemp11090455980(fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik)
   NOCOMPRESS
   TABLESPACE cobimediumindex),
   CONSTRAINT RGTEMP11090455983 UNIQUE (srcmbrprmyhrnid,srcsnpshtmmnb) USING INDEX (CREATE UNIQUE INDEX cobidm.rgtemp11090455984 ON cobidm.rgtemp11090455980(srcmbrprmyhrnid,srcsnpshtmmnb)
   NOCOMPRESS
   TABLESPACE cobimediumindex)
   ) TABLESPACE cobihcc
   PARTITION BY RANGE (dsnpshtmmik) INTERVAL (1)
   (PARTITION partempty VALUES LESS THAN (190001)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobi_hcc COLUMN STORE COMPRESS FOR QUERY LOW)
   PARALLEL 4;
   ;

   What I am getting today is shown below. This has the effect of forcing the creation of all of these partitions whether I have data that needs them or not, which therefore does not follow my model definition. I have to edit the script to remove the unnecessary partitions.

   --

   -- Script generated by Schema Compare for Oracle 4.0.10.528 on 16/11/2018 07:34:27

   SET DEFINE OFF
   SET SQLBLANKLINES ON

   CREATE TABLE cobidm.rgtemp11090455980 (
   fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik NUMBER NOT NULL,
   dmbrprmyhrnik NUMBER NOT NULL,
   <skipping columns for bevity>
   crdsprcscntlupdid NUMBER NOT NULL,
   CONSTRAINT RGTEMP11090455981 PRIMARY KEY (fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik) USING INDEX (CREATE UNIQUE INDEX cobidm.rgtemp11090455982 ON cobidm.rgtemp11090455980(fmbrtenuremmsnpshtik)
   NOCOMPRESS
   TABLESPACE cobimediumindex),
   CONSTRAINT RGTEMP11090455983 UNIQUE (srcmbrprmyhrnid,srcsnpshtmmnb) USING INDEX (CREATE UNIQUE INDEX cobidm.rgtemp11090455984 ON cobidm.rgtemp11090455980(srcmbrprmyhrnid,srcsnpshtmmnb)
   NOCOMPRESS
   TABLESPACE cobimediumindex)
   ) TABLESPACE cobihcc
   PARTITION BY RANGE (dsnpshtmmik) INTERVAL (1)
   (PARTITION partempty VALUES LESS THAN (190001)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobihcc COLUMN STORE COMPRESS FOR QUERY LOW,
   PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (201310)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobimediumdata NOCOMPRESS,
   PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (201311)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobimediumdata NOCOMPRESS,
   PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (201312)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobimedium_data NOCOMPRESS,

   <skipping many lines for brevity>

   PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (201811)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobimediumdata NOCOMPRESS,
   PARTITION VALUES LESS THAN (201812)
   INDEXING ON
   TABLESPACE cobimediumdata NOCOMPRESS)
   PARALLEL 4;

   For background on Oracle's interval partitioning feature, see chapter 4 of Oracle Database Concept for release 12.2.

   Our practice is to create interval-partitioned tables with the minimum number of partitions necessary to create the table (usually just one partition), and let Oracle create all others as data arrives requiring them. Between test, QA, and production databases, data arrives at different times, giving rise to automatic creation of different partitions. But because these differences are only a side-effect of different contents, they are not relevant, in the same way that differences in system-generated constraint names are not relevant. Changing the partition… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Performance

   The step where the product (Source Control for Oracle) accesses the Oracle instance to return a list of schemas is taking a long time to run, and in one of my development instances, it actually fails to finish.

   It seems to be running the following SQL

   (SELECT username, 'TRUE' as isempty from allusers
   minus
   select owner, 'TRUE' as isempty from allobjects)
   union all
   ( SELECT username, 'FALSE' as isempty from allusers
   intersect
   select owner, 'FALSE' as isempty from allobjects)

   if the query accepts parameter(s), it should speed up that part tremendously.

   (SELECT username, 'TRUE' as isempty from allusers where username = <parameter>
   minus
   select owner, 'TRUE' as isempty from allobjects where owner = <parameter>)
   union all
   ( SELECT username, 'FALSE' as isempty from allusers where username = <parameter>
   intersect
   select owner, 'FALSE' as isempty from allobjects where owner = <parameter>)

   The step where the product (Source Control for Oracle) accesses the Oracle instance to return a list of schemas is taking a long time to run, and in one of my development instances, it actually fails to finish.

   It seems to be running the following SQL

   (SELECT username, 'TRUE' as isempty from allusers
   minus
   select owner, 'TRUE' as isempty from allobjects)
   union all
   ( SELECT username, 'FALSE' as isempty from allusers
   intersect
   select owner, 'FALSE' as isempty from allobjects)

   if the query accepts parameter(s), it should speed up that part tremendously.

   (SELECT… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Source Control  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. separate type spec and type body

   Please separate type specifications and type bodies. (e.g. "CREATE TYPE FOO AS OBJECT" and "CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE BODY FOO"). Most of the time our changes are only to the body but Schema Compare will try to recreate the spec on deployment even if the spec has not changed.

   This will fail if it has dependencies and make automated builds fail when using the Deployment Suite for Oracle with a build system.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Roaming Profiles

   Please don't save the parameters like ConnectionStore.xml and LinkedDatabases.xml in the LocalApp-dir in the Userprofile.
   We have activated roaming profiles and die LocalApp-Dir doesn't save and load again, if I logoff and logon on another computer.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Source Control  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Visual Studio extension

   We use TOAD extension for Visual Studio. The one nice thing about that tool is that it integrates the database project with our solution (and TFS), and offers a way to Deploy the database from the scripts that the TOAD extension creates (tables, procedures, etc). It also has a way to run a pre and post deployment scripts. Would be fanstatic if the redgate tools had this as well.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Update connections to support TLS 1.1 and 1.2

   The lib's for external git connections do not use the more secure TLS connection protocols. Please update so users in security conscious environments can connect to secure servers that do not support SSLv3 and TLS v1.0

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Source Control  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Foreign Keys not included in comparison if referenced table is excluded by the Ignore Rules Filter

   This presents a problem for fully capturing table DDL definitions that are selected for the comparison

   It is not immediately clear, and may be difficult to detect that FKs are excluded / failed to be captured, unless a full / unfiltered schema comparison is performed.

   There is no indication that the FKs are suppressed and no setting will include them.

   Are there any Schema Compare for Oracle and / or Source Control for Oracle users who would like to see the FK keys that reference Ignored Tables to be included in the deployment script or recorded in the DDL for the table? Or at least be warned that the referencing object is listed in the Ignore Rules?

   This presents a problem for fully capturing table DDL definitions that are selected for the comparison

   It is not immediately clear, and may be difficult to detect that FKs are excluded / failed to be captured, unless a full / unfiltered schema comparison is performed.

   There is no indication that the FKs are suppressed and no setting will include them.

   Are there any Schema Compare for Oracle and / or Source Control for Oracle users who would like to see the FK keys that reference Ignored Tables to be included in the deployment script or recorded in the DDL for… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. When changing a table to a view Schema Compare does not drop table first, and then create view.

   Could it interpret the order to take same-named objects?

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Virtual Columns Should Be Ignored By Default

    Since you can't update the values, why compare them in the first place?

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Compare  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Locking and unlocking the objects in Oracle

    Hi Team,

    Lock and unlock the objects in oracle. Anyone can unlock and lock the objects, but our requirement it's should be configurable. some admin or some user has control to unlock the objects.

    For example, User ABC Locked the EMP tables currently anyone can unlock the objects but it's should either ABC user need to unlock or give some admin user to unlock the objects. We need to some control required to maintain the locking and unlocking the objects and there is no audit info as well.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  All Oracle  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Include option to create refresh groups (like Refresh Group X)

    Would be nice to be able to include projects into fresh groups -- so group or similar projects could be refreshed together.

    Individual refreshes may become tedious, and the Refresh All may be too broad.

    Alt as a simpler implementation provide the ability to exclude projects from a bulk (Refresh All) -- e.g. by marking a project as inactive.

    Example:
    If I have 15 projects total:
    - 5 defined as belong to Group A,
    - 4 belong to Group B,
    - 4 are unaffiliated
    - 2 are inactive

    Would like to be able to:
    - refresh Group A (project count: 5)
    - refresh Group B (project count: 4)
    - Refresh All (project count: 13)

    Would be nice to be able to include projects into fresh groups -- so group or similar projects could be refreshed together.

    Individual refreshes may become tedious, and the Refresh All may be too broad.

    Alt as a simpler implementation provide the ability to exclude projects from a bulk (Refresh All) -- e.g. by marking a project as inactive.

    Example:
    If I have 15 projects total:
    - 5 defined as belong to Group A,
    - 4 belong to Group B,
    - 4 are unaffiliated
    - 2 are inactive

    Would like to be able to:
    - refresh Group A (project count:… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Source Control  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Include policy-comparison for tables

    We are using Virtual Private Database on some schemas. These profiles are not included in current comparison.

    Please include this. :-)

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. wildcard

    Please add advanced filtering in Schema Compare. E.g. wildcard or regex matches to only show objects matching a certain criteria.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Command line interactive report

    As with Schema compare tool, Data compare Tool should generate an interactive report.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Compare  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Source Control feature for Mercurial Kiln

    Please add an option to directly integrate Source Control with the Kiln Repository. We could see no option other than GIT, Team, SVN etc.,

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    AdminDavid Atkinson (Product Manager, Redgate) responded

    The recommendation for this scenario is to use the “link to working folder” option in Source Control for Oracle.

17. Support for Serena PVCS

    Please add support for Serena PVCS Version Manager (PVCS VM)
    http://www.serena.com/index.php/en/products/pvcs-vm/

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Source Control  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. support retargeting: allow to skip schema "refresh" when changing connection details and schema selection

    This is a major issue

    If I configure a compare between two schemas, with field restrictions, and where clauses, save it as a profile, and copy to a new file, those settings all get clobbered when I try to configure the same compare between two different schemas/instances.

    Even if the setup as is definitely applies to these new targets, the tool reexamines the table structure, and enables everything, tossing all my configs, even when I don't want it to. I'm sure this was envisioned as a helpful 'feature', but it's needless. It's destroying my work, and could have been accomplished with a "refresh schema" button or something.

    The only way I have right now to retarget a project is to edit the XML file by hand. And it's not a few places. There db owner is embedded in 1198 places throughout the .dco file, in my case.

    Even with such a feature, it should be smarter, retaining the settings selected, where still applicable, but first things first.

    This is a major issue

    If I configure a compare between two schemas, with field restrictions, and where clauses, save it as a profile, and copy to a new file, those settings all get clobbered when I try to configure the same compare between two different schemas/instances.

    Even if the setup as is definitely applies to these new targets, the tool reexamines the table structure, and enables everything, tossing all my configs, even when I don't want it to. I'm sure this was envisioned as a helpful 'feature', but it's needless. It's destroying my work, and could have been accomplished… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Ability to select same schema as source and target specify scn or flashback time of both

    Oracle has a feature called flashback query/schema that allows you to view a table/schema as of a particular timestamp. For some projects, there is a need to identify all the tables inserted/updated/deleted by a particular application process.

    This would be an additional use case for Data Compare if it checked if flashback was enabled on the source and target schemas and allowed specifying a time.

    Then it could be used for my use case - i.e. identifying what impact a particular front end screen or batch process had on the database.

    It could also be used after a major incident as an alternative to a full backup e.g. user deletes lots of data they didnt intend to from a test system and data compare could be used to create a fix script to flash back (using where clause by username on the relevant tables)

    This could be mimicked today by creating a new schema as a copy of the exiting but that requires double the database space to hold the copy and a process to make the copy. Using flashback would mean no preparation to do the compare and making use of a great Oracle feature to enhance Redgate Data Compare.

    Oracle has a feature called flashback query/schema that allows you to view a table/schema as of a particular timestamp. For some projects, there is a need to identify all the tables inserted/updated/deleted by a particular application process.

    This would be an additional use case for Data Compare if it checked if flashback was enabled on the source and target schemas and allowed specifying a time.

    Then it could be used for my use case - i.e. identifying what impact a particular front end screen or batch process had on the database.

    It could also be used after a major incident… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Data Compare  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. hide

    Add option to filter out object that EQUAL.
    In other words - show only differences/all/etc.
    
    Add ability to go Next Difference (when usig show all)

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Schema Compare  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close