239 results found
-
Possible bug -- changed behavour of Swap left and right button on the data sources page
In the latest version (updated this morning), the swap button changes server names, etc. shown in the header part of the page (source and target), but leaves info filled in on the bottom half alone. Can be confusing as to which server/database/etc. will be the source/left side and which will be the target/right side.
1 vote -
Compare View with a table
just like in sql data compare, it would be nice to compare a view with a table.
1 vote -
Add Ignore whitespace in string literals option
The behavior of the "Ignore whitespace" option was changed in version 13.3:
SC-9967: "Ignore whitespace" option is no longer applied to string literalsThis option would retain legacy functionality by adding the ability to still ignore whitespace in string literals.
3 votes -
Add Summary View command line option
Currently there are 3 output options when running sql compare via the command line /quiet /verbose and the default. I'd like to see an option between the default and verbose logging similar to the "Summary view" present in the main application.
For example: I'd like to see the tablename that has diffs (default option) AND the name of the index on said table that is different (new summary option), but not the entire table definition (verbose option).1 vote -
Ignore indexes option should not query indexes
If indexes & partition schemas/functions are set to be ignored, SQL Compare should not attempt to query them. Additionally would be helpful for other object types that are ignored so that the queries are streamlined to only what is selected for compare. This would be a performance enhancement, the pain is where there is a high number of partitions where the intention is just to compare something simple like stored procedures and UDFs.
1 vote -
Flter save location does not exist causes exception
After you specify a file path and save your filter.
Delete the directory where the filter was saved
Click the "Save" button again and you get an exception. Need a "Save As" function or something to override the setting you set last time.1 vote -
SQL Compare Flagged store procedure difference but could not see where
SQL Compare Flagged a difference between Test and Production Store Procedure but I could not see where. I had to use notepad++ compare to see a Single Space. Please make this visible in the next release.
1 vote -
Include tables in "use drop and create instead of alter" comparison behavior
Provide additional option to "use drop and create instead of alter" so that tables can be reconstructed blindly
32 votes -
Add BACPAC to SQL Compare (and SQL Data Compare)
At the moment you can compare Database, Backup, Snapshot and Source Control.
Please add a BACPAC file as well.
A BACPAC is an artifact that encapsulates the database schema as well as the data stored in the database. The BACPAC is a Windows file with a .bacpac extension. Similar to the DACPAC, the BACPAC file format is open – the schema contents of the BACPAC are identical to that of the DACPAC. The data is stored in JSON format.
How to: Import and Export a Database (Windows Azure SQL Database)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/hh335292.aspxImport a BACPAC File to Create a New User…
88 votes -
Compare (and migrate) Database Diagrams
I'd love to see a function in SQL Compare to compare and migrate Database Diagrams. Especially between servers, but certainly on the same server.
We use them all the time to work on the structure of the of our databases and I'd love to be able to see the same diagram when I'm working in Prod and Test as I do in Dev without having to bring the changes across manually.
The code (for the easy case) is pretty simple.
UPDATE MyDB.dbo.sysdiagrams
SET definition = (
SELECT definition
from MyOtherDB.dbo.sysdiagrams
WHERE name = MyDB')
WHERE name = 'MyDB'17 votes -
Provide the ability to specify object permissions within custom filter rules
Currently (v 13), there is an all-or-none project option to include or exclude object permissions across all database objects. It would be fabulous to push that option down into custom filter rules so inclusions/exclusions can happen more granularly, at an object-level. Use case: the majority of our tables use generic permissions but a small subset of tables use ActiveDrictory groups that differ by environment so we have to manage them as a special case. I'd love to be able to specify something like this as a filter rule: 'generate object permissions for all tables except tables that begin with <blah>'.
4 votes -
I have found that User Defined Data Types are not scripted after stored procedures that use that data type.
I have found that User Defined Data Types are not scripted after stored procedures that use that data type.
3 votes -
Add option to ignore target only objects
When comparing two databases it would be nice to have the ability to have objects that only exist in the target be ignored. It is somewhat dangerous to have an option that would cause objects to be dropped and it would be good to be able to not have that show.
4 votes -
Compare against Database Projects
It would be great to see SQL Compare support Visual Studio Database Projects (.sqlproj).
Current if you choose Source Control | Scripts, you can point to the project folder, but then SQL Compare gets confused because it loads in extra .sql files (eg. the 'create database'.sql that gets put in the build output 'bin' folder).
Selecting the 'Tables' sub-folder works more reliably (if just comparing tables!), but then pushing changes down to the files results in schema that no longer compiles because the SSDT tools require 'GO' separators between each DDL statement.
5 votes -
Comparing TFS Changesets
When comparing a TFS Changeset in SQL Compare it will show all schema changes that are different between the Changeset and the destination, but within a TFS Changeset, there is metadata within the Changeset to indicate which specific database objects are being changed within the Changeset. It would be a huge timesaver to allow SQL Compare to be able to only select the database objects that are actually being impacted by the Changeset by default. The situation I have is this:
Developer 1 - Adds a table to database A and checks in the change to the development database, but…
6 votes -
Display last change dates in top database strip
Display last change dates of repository for databases under SQL Source Control.
And display also last schema change date from database.
4 votes -
My projects - compare all projects
Add an additional "Compare all" button to compare all projects in the actual "Look in" folder. Show a simple is equal/different indicator on each project for the results.
Consider using VS-style solution files or kind of meta-scp.
This is somewhat similar to https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/141379-sql-compare/suggestions/13517250-auto-compare-after-oping-a-project-mass-compare
6 votes -
Drop
Add an option to DO NOT DROP missing fields in the target, this way I'm just adding missing fields from the source.
16 votes -
Unecessary table rebuild
The tool will try to rebuild the whole table even when the only thing needed is the addition of one column. If you need it, I can send an image of the comparison results. To work around it, I search for rebuilds within the generated script and substitute them by the needed command, specially if the table is a very large one.
1 vote -
Option to select individual dependencies (or affected objects) when migrating changes with the deployment Wizard.
Currently the Deployment Wizard only allows for all dependencies to be specified, or not. If I know a specific dependency to be problematic (will fail the overall deployment if selected) my only options are to not deploy dependencies (not good) or to generate a migration script and step through it a bit at a time or remove references for the dependencies I need to skip, which can be cumbersome when dealing with many changes. It would be nice to be able to choose all dependencies (current option), specify not to deploy dependencies (currently an option), or incrementally check on or…
74 votes
- Don't see your idea?