179 results found

1. Don't refresh the commit/get latest automatically

   Having an option to calculate/determine the synchronizing between source control and local objects can be triggered with a button action rather than automatically starting this process when the source control tab is in focus.

   317 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   42 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminStephanie (Product Manager, Redgate) responded

   As of SQL Source Control 6.3.2, there is an option 'DisableAutoRefresh' to disable automatic refresh of the commit and get latest tabs. See https://documentation.red-gate.com/soc6/troubleshooting/refresh-in-commit-and-get-latest-tabs-takes-a-long-time for more details. Please get in contact if you have any additional feedback on this issue.

2. Allow me to filter the objects on the commit/get latest tabs

   Provide option to filtering based on type of objects just like sql compare and then select all or unselect all option. This will speed up the selection process.

   41 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   13 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminChris Smith (Project Manager - SQL Lighthouse, Redgate) responded

   Object Filtering appears in SQL Source Control from version 2.2.

   For more information, please visit:
   http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-source-control/features

   We’d love to hear from you if the object filtering feature does not satisfy your request – please add a comment.

3. Create Database from source control using the command line

   It would be great if it would be possible to create a database from source control using the command line interface (or some api).

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Crash (unrecoverable) after checking in some objects, but not dependencies

   Message shown after Registering Live Database stage of refreshing display.

   Failed to update:

   oEc.#8Jf: Failed to locate the target table [dbo].[tbNMI] for the FKtbNMINSRDtbNMI foreign key. ---> RedGate.SQLCompare.Engine.SqlCompareException: Failed to locate the target table [dbo].[tbNMI] for the FKtbNMINSRDtbNMI foreign key. ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1435, offset:37 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 211, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1369, offset:0 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 210, offset:30 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 213, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 773, offset:61 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 757, offset:31 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 771, offset:14 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1514, offset:36 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1357, offset:63 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 165, offset:468 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1507, offset:800 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1373, offset:18 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 211, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 215, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1205, offset:143 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1204, offset:6 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 958, offset:31 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 957, offset:0 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1455, offset:0 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1359, offset:117 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 149, offset:11 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 186, offset:137 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 930, offset:22 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1633, offset:31 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1002, offset:500 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1006, offset:109 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1008, offset:22 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1010, offset:13

   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at #oEc.#7Jf.#t.#B3.#sKf()
   at #oEc.#7Jf.#gKf(Action action)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---

   Server stack trace:
   at #eEc.#fEc.#t.#izb.#j5f()
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext, Object[]& outArgs)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.PrivateProcessMessage(RuntimeMethodHandle md, Object[] args, Object server, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext, Object[]& outArgs)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)

   Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.CommonUI.Forms.ErrorDialog.DoWithObviousExceptionsThrowAll(Action action)
   at #JLc.#PLc.#CTc(ICancellableOperation`1 operation, Object token)

   Message shown after Registering Live Database stage of refreshing display.

   Failed to update:

   oEc.#8Jf: Failed to locate the target table [dbo].[tbNMI] for the FKtbNMINSRDtbNMI foreign key. ---> RedGate.SQLCompare.Engine.SqlCompareException: Failed to locate the target table [dbo].[tbNMI] for the FKtbNMINSRDtbNMI foreign key. ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1435, offset:37 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 211, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1369, offset:0 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 210, offset:30 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 213, offset:38 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 773, offset:61 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 757, offset:31 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 771, offset:14 ---> SmartAssembly.SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException: SmartExceptionsCore.UnhandledException @ 1514, offset:36

   … more
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Thank you!

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpJyG7B6tAI

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

   Thanks for your feedback! It’s great to hear! :-)
   I’m closing this suggestion so you can have your votes back…

6. Support Multiple instances of SSMS

   It would be really handy to support mulitple instances of SSMS, especially for multi-monitor people.

   173 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   33 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  Jonathan Hickford responded

   Yesterday we released SQL Source Control 3.5, which includes support for multiple SSMS instances. Thank you to everyone who tested the beta.

   Please check for updates to install. Full release notes on http://documentation.red-gate.com/display/SOC3/SQL+Source+Control+3.5+release+notes

7. BUG: Objects with extended properties can't be committed

   When adding extended properties to tables (like an svn keyword) it fails to commit

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

   We think this issue has been fixed in v1.0. If you are still experiencing any problems, please contact support@red-gate.com.

8. Changes to dbo schema can't commit

   After granting the dbo schema rights to a userdefined role I can't commit it

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

   This has been fixed in the latest release.

   Thank you!

9. Exclude objects from versioning (svn:ignore)

   As it is possible to exclude some files from SVN using file source control it would be great to remove some objects that we do not want to version - for example test procedures or users.

   261 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   40 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   completed  ·  AdminChris Smith (Project Manager - SQL Lighthouse, Redgate) responded

   Object Filtering now appears in SQL Source Control version 2.2!

   For more information about the release, please see:

   http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=13735

10. Support merge / branch

    I want to be able to work with more then one database, I want to have database for each developer that are all branches of the "trunk" db.

    156 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminStephanie (Product Manager, Redgate) responded

    We now support branches from your source control system. You should be able to branch in your source control system and then link a database directly to that branch.

    Please contact support@red-gate.com if you have any problems or post a new suggestion for more specific features that you’d like us to implement around this, https://redgate.uservoice.com.

    Thank you!
    Stephanie M. Herr :-)
    SQL Source Control Product Manager

11. "Failed to update" message after encountering a ";" in a stored procedure

    Ran into an issue when entering a stored procedure with a semi colon in it.

    Failed to update:

    oEc.#8Jf: Errors occured whilst parsing file C:\Documents and Settings\Adam\Local Settings\Application Data\Red Gate\SQL Source Control 0\WorkingBases\4c857d86-7cf5-464b-86bc-01d4f22d1423\Stored Procedures\Article.GetArticlesByKewords.sql

    'line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]'
    ---> cZ: Errors occured whilst parsing file C:\Documents and Settings\Adam\Local Settings\Application Data\Red Gate\SQL Source Control 0\WorkingBases\4c857d86-7cf5-464b-86bc-01d4f22d1423\Stored Procedures\Article.GetArticlesByKewords.sql
    'line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]'
    ---> line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at #oEc.#7Jf.#t.#B3.#sKf()
    at #oEc.#7Jf.#gKf(Action action)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---

    Server stack trace:
    at #eEc.#fEc.#t.#izb.#j5f()
    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[] args, Object server, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext, Object[]& outArgs)
    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.PrivateProcessMessage(RuntimeMethodHandle md, Object[] args, Object server, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext, Object[]& outArgs)
    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.AsyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, IMessageSink replySink)

    Exception rethrown at [0]:
    at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.CommonUI.Forms.ErrorDialog.DoWithObviousExceptionsThrowAll(Action action)
    at #JLc.#PLc.#CTc(ICancellableOperation`1 operation, Object token)

    For your information, the following is the text in the stored procedure....

    -- =============================================
    
    -- Author: <Chandrashekar>
    
    -- Create date: <10 Jun 2009>
    
    -- Description: <Get Articles By Kewords and Section >
    
    -- =============================================
    
    CREATE Procedure [Article].[GetArticlesByKewords]
    
    (
    
    @Keywords varchar(max) = '',
    
    @Section varchar(50) = Null,
    
    @ArticleId int = Null, --For Suppressing Articles
    
    @CountID int = Null,
    
    @IncludeDeleted bit = 0
    
    )
    
    As
    
    /*
    
    SELECT
    
    distinct c.contentid as contentid,
    
    c.titlebox1 as title,
    
    c.section as section,
    
    c.keywords as keyword,
    
    c.priority as priority,
    
    article.section.SectionName as description
    
    FROM
    
    content c
    
    CROSS APPLY dbo.Csvtovarchar(@Keywords) r
    
    INNER JOIN content On c.keywords LIKE '%' + r.VarCharValue + '%'
    
    INNER JOIN article.section ON article.section.SectionCode =c. section-- @Section
    
    WHERE c.contenttype='ARTICLE'
    
    AND
    
    (
    
    (@Section IS NULL )OR
    
    (@Section IS NOT NULL AND c.section LIKE '%' + @Section + '%' )
    
    )

    AND
    
    (
    
    (@ArticleId IS NULL )OR
    
    (@ArticleId IS NOT NULL AND c.contentid <> @ArticleId )
    
    ) */

    ;

    With cte (rank,contentid,title,section,keyword,priority,description)
    
    As (
    
    SELECT
    
    --row_number() Over(Order by c.priority),
    
    rank() Over(Order by c.contentid ),
    
    c.contentid as contentid,
    
    c.titlebox1 as title,
    
    c.section as section,
    
    c.keywords as keyword,
    
    c.priority as priority,
    
    article.section.SectionName as description
    
    FROM
    
    content c
    
    CROSS APPLY dbo.Csvtovarchar(@Keywords) r
    
    --INNER JOIN content On c.keywords LIKE '%' + r.VarCharValue + '%'
    
    INNER JOIN article.section ON article.section.SectionCode = c. section-- @Section
    
    WHERE c.contenttype='ARTICLE'
    
    And c.keywords LIKE '%' + r.VarCharValue + '%'
    
    AND
    
    (
    
    (@Section IS NULL )OR
    
    (@Section IS NOT NULL AND c.section LIKE '%' + @Section + '%' )
    
    )

    AND
    
    (
    
    (@ArticleId IS NULL )OR
    
    (@ArticleId IS NOT NULL AND c.contentid <> @ArticleId )
    
    )
    
    And
    
    (
    
    (@IncludeDeleted = 1) Or
    
    (c.priority > 0)
    
    )
    
    )
    
    Select Distinct
    
    contentid, title, section, keyword, priority, description
    
    FROM CTE
    
    Where (@CountID Is Null) Or (@CountID >= rank)

    Looking at the procedure, it shouldn't have a semi colon where it does, but still I would expect the application to be able to handle it.

    Ran into an issue when entering a stored procedure with a semi colon in it.

    Failed to update:

    oEc.#8Jf: Errors occured whilst parsing file C:\Documents and Settings\Adam\Local Settings\Application Data\Red Gate\SQL Source Control 0\WorkingBases\4c857d86-7cf5-464b-86bc-01d4f22d1423\Stored Procedures\Article.GetArticlesByKewords.sql

    'line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]'
    ---> cZ: Errors occured whilst parsing file C:\Documents and Settings\Adam\Local Settings\Application Data\Red Gate\SQL Source Control 0\WorkingBases\4c857d86-7cf5-464b-86bc-01d4f22d1423\Stored Procedures\Article.GetArticlesByKewords.sql
    'line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]'
    ---> line 47:2: unexpected token: [";",<631>,line=47,col=2] [char=1276]
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at #oEc.#7Jf.#t.#B3.#sKf()
    at #oEc.#7Jf.#gKf(Action action)
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---

    Server stack trace:
    at #eEc.#fEc.#t.#izb.#j5f()
    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink._PrivateProcessMessage(IntPtr md, Object[]… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    This has been fixed in EA2 (v0.2.1), which was released on Mon 22 Feb 2010.

12. Crash with Analysis Services

    When I try to open up an analysis services database (to view), SQL Source Control crashes.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    This was fixed in v0.2.1. Please upgrade to the latest version by clicking Help > Check for Updates.

13. Actions in a submenu would be useful

    I can right-click on a database (or item within) in Object Explorer and see a choice labelled "SQL Source Control", but all it does is open the tab in the main area. It would be great if it also had a submenu (like TortoiseSVN does in Windows Explorer) which offered "Update", "Commit", "Show log", "Diff", "Revert", "Delete" and so on. Actually it would be great if the latter actions were offered at all (show log, diff, etc.) because to do them now, I need to jump over to Windows Explorer and use Tortoise.

    50 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    In EA2 (v0.2.1), we added Commit and Get Latest to the Object Explorer right click menu. If you would like other features, please vote/comment on the following (we would need to implement these first before adding them to the right click menu):
    Revert/Undo Pending Change – http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/491513-revert-undo-pending-change
    Show Log/History – http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/471982-tab-for-svn-log-show-history-
    Open DB from Source Control – http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/459952-open-a-database-from-source-control
    Diff/Compare with previous version – http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/39019-sql-source-control/suggestions/491523-diff-or-compare-versions-of-an-object

14. Commit check in comment needs to be larger

    text area too small- didnt even notice it. Would be good to have multiline comments.

    60 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  Tanya Joseph responded

    This is available in SQL Source Control v2.1

15. "create to new link to source control" link not enabled

    can't set up my link to the source control:

    http://i.imgur.com/Uy7wY.jpg

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    The links are disabled until a user selects a database in Object Explorer.

16. Support for SQL 2008 R2
    26 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    EA4 (and later) now supports SSMS 2008 R2! Email SqlSourceControlSupport@red-gate.com if you need the download link.

17. Where are the credentials coming from?

    After I connect to a database, everything works very intuitively. In fact it's so intuitive that I see my account used for commits, but I'm not sure where it found my login credentials. Is there a way to use a different set of credentials if you have multiple svn accounts?

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Source Control Data (Data folder is blank)

    would be awesome if it scripted the data as well

    250 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Static Data  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    SQL Source Control v2.0 is now available with support for source controlling your static lookup data from within SSMS. For more details, see http://www.red-gate.com/MessageBoard/viewtopic.php?t=12947.

    If you’ve been using SQL Data Compare Pro to source control your data in the “Data” folder, then please contact support@red-gate.com to keep your history.

    If you need any advanced features, like only source controlling a subset of columns or limiting the rows with a WHERE clause, then you will need to continue to use SQL Data Compare Pro, http://www.red-gate.com/help/SourceControlData.html.

19. Works very intuitively

    Adding a database to a repository and doing the first commits works very intuitively. Great job!

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    completed  ·  AdminRedgate Administrator (Admin, Redgate) responded

    Thanks for your feedback! It’s great to hear! :-)
    I’m closing this suggestion so you can have your votes back…