588 results found

1. Provide a way to post configurations that must be implemented as TO DO items

   I have a service broker application where some parts such as service routes etc must be defined per database configuration, thus certain components change per installation so it would be nice to tag such items as TO DO items, like wise once complete when comparing to latest or changes the item is not displayed as an object that has changed.

   Going further it might be nice to populate table data that also configures per installation as well

   perhaps use of extended properties, or a file present in source. I had taken the source code and placed a comment in it hoping it might at least show up during sql compare or getting latest code, didn't work on database level objects

   I have a service broker application where some parts such as service routes etc must be defined per database configuration, thus certain components change per installation so it would be nice to tag such items as TO DO items, like wise once complete when comparing to latest or changes the item is not displayed as an object that has changed.

   Going further it might be nice to populate table data that also configures per installation as well

   perhaps use of extended properties, or a file present in source. I had taken the source code and placed a comment in it… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. BUG(?): Rebuilding a table via migration script doesn't add the correct authorization commands

   When rebuilding a table via migration scripts, the ALTER AUTHORIZATION TO... commands are omitted on the replacement table when the migration script is created by SSC.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Cannot Get Latest

   Everytime I try to Get Latest I get the following....

   System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts ---> System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts
   at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.LinkedDatabase.GetDatabaseFolderWorkspaces(ICancellableOperationStatus status, IScriptFolderStructure scriptFolderStructure, IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks callBacks, SourceControlRevision& revision)
   at #GWeb.#WXM.#Fieb()
   at #GWeb.#Wheb.#tieb(Func1 )
at #GWeb.#WXM.#8ZW(Boolean )
at #GWeb.#XXM.#yRW()
at #GWeb.#WXM.#qYM()
at #GWeb.#XXM.#iS()
at #qlhb.#0heb.#l36(String , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus )
at #qlhb.#K3c.#83c(String , #O9U , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#A3.#eL5b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#jzb.#Qnw()
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#VAb.#xSXc()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#uz2b(String , IDatabaseConnection , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action )
at #qlhb.#0heb.#wieb(IBoundDatabase , ICompareOptions , Boolean , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action )
at #GWeb.#VXM.#mYM[#NrPb](IBoundDatabase , Func2 , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector , Action )
   at #GWeb.#VXM.#kYM(IBoundDatabase , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector )
   at #GWeb.#4Ec.#8Jc(ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , IDifferenceSelector )
   at #GWeb.#4Ec.#izb.#SB7b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
   at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.MutexedCancellableOperation1.#u3.#k5f()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.CancellableOperationBase.InvokeWithTracker(String featureUsageKey, Action action)
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Cancellables.MutexedCancellableOperation1.Invoke()
   at #eEc.#Qlg.Invoke()
   at #JLc.#PLc.#Jfb.#EJf()
   at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.SmartAssembly.ExceptionReporting.ErrorReporterBase.Do(Action , Predicate1 , Boolean )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.SmartAssembly.ExceptionReporting.ErrorReporterBase.DoWithObviousExceptionsRethrowAll(Action action)
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.CommonUI.Forms.ErrorDialog.DoWithObviousExceptionsRethrowAll(Action action)
at #JLc.#PLc.#CTc(ICancellableOperation1 , Object )

   Everytime I try to Get Latest I get the following....

   System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts ---> System.Exception: Failed to update to the head revision after 10 attempts
   at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.LinkedDatabase.GetDatabaseFolderWorkspaces(ICancellableOperationStatus status, IScriptFolderStructure scriptFolderStructure, IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks callBacks, SourceControlRevision& revision)
   at #GWeb.#WXM.#Fieb()
   at #GWeb.#Wheb.#tieb(Func1 )
at #GWeb.#WXM.#8ZW(Boolean )
at #GWeb.#XXM.#yRW()
at #GWeb.#WXM.#qYM()
at #GWeb.#XXM.#iS()
at #qlhb.#0heb.#l36(String , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus )
at #qlhb.#K3c.#83c(String , #O9U , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#A3.#eL5b(ICancellableOperationStatus )
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#jzb.#Qnw()
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#YZBc.#VAb.#xSXc()
at RedGate.SQLSourceControl.Engine.Diff.Memoization.ReattachableMemoizer.#uz2b(String , IDatabaseConnection , #1heb , ICancellableOperationStatus , IReadOnlySourceControlServerCallBacks , Action… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. get latest from source control - dependencies

   After you click the "Get Latest" button, while the "Determining schema changes" step is processing, there is a dialog that will sometimes pop up that says "Get latest from source control - dependencies". The "affected objects" list does not include the schema name for these objects. For databases that make heavy use of schema names, the schema name is critical to display here.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Buggy feature with Mercurial, maybe other source control systems too.

   When I update to a node in a branch that is not the head of the branch, for instance to rollback my database to a previous tag. The moment I hit the get latest tab in SQL Source Control, it automatically updates to the head of my branch, making it impossible to revert to a previous version.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Clone db from server to other server

   Clone db from server a tomserver b without genarating a bk file
   Direct bk restor without generating file
   This alow to save time and space

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   5 comments  ·  History/Log  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. When tables with linked data are renamed, the new tables do not have linked data

   Linked data settings should be remembered when a table is renamed

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Static Data  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Allow the re-ordering of columns via drag and drop in the commit changes grid
   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Allow migration script to be added even if I don't want to check in all dependant objects

   When I try to create a migration script on a (not yet checked in) object, and that object has a dependency on another object, then SQL Source Control requires that I add the dependent objects to the migration script and the subsequent checkin. SQL Source control is correct that there's a SQL-level dependency between the two objects, but as a developer, I can tell that it's safe to check in one without the other.

   As a workaround, if I checkin the change first without the migration script, SQL Source Control suggests that I also checkin the dependent objects, but doesn't require it. I can then add a migration script to the already-checked-in change.

   I'd like to avoid using this workaround and be able to directly add a migration script and not include dependent objects.

   When I try to create a migration script on a (not yet checked in) object, and that object has a dependency on another object, then SQL Source Control requires that I add the dependent objects to the migration script and the subsequent checkin. SQL Source control is correct that there's a SQL-level dependency between the two objects, but as a developer, I can tell that it's safe to check in one without the other.

   As a workaround, if I checkin the change first without the migration script, SQL Source Control suggests that I also checkin the dependent objects, but doesn't … more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. scripting changes

    A while ago I had discussed with Redgate about how to allow sql source control to create scripts for releases to deploy db changes.
    This mostly works, except when there are changes that require more logic to properly handle existing data when certain db object changes are made.

    For instance, adding a new column to a table (that has data in it) that is required, but does not have a default.

    The current way of handling this is to create a custom script for that change at the time of check in. The problem with this is that it requires you to check in all the changes you have made up to that point, and it basically now requires your prod db to go through steps of the versions of the db you checked into source control. I get why you did it this way, but one of the things that we like about the diff tool and script changes, is that it takes the end result of what we checked in, and makes a script to make those changes happen. This method of custom scripts, makes your prod db go through these “versions” that you checked in. We check in code all the time, and this would be several versions. On top of that, when I want to check in the one table change, I may not have everything else in the db done yet (other sp’s or views that use this table) so I can’t really check in the db “version” I just want to check in these table changes. Then on top of that, requrements may change, and make it so that I don’t need this field at all, or something else that makes me not want the prod DB to ever go to this “version” that I checked in. We would rather it use the end result of the objects we have checked in, compare to prod, and make a script to move the differences.

    Well, before I did not have a good idea of what to do about this, but now I do. Not 100% on all the details, but here is the idea.
    Instead of allowing a custom script to move a batch of changes, you allow the user to edit a script for a single change. You may even restrict this further to only table changes, and maybe even further to only changes in the population of the temp table that is created (where it normally copies over the data), as that is normally where this issue happens. Anyway, it generates the sql to make the change, then the user will edit the script to put in the correct data, then the app would compare this against the original, and keep track of the differences, as a search and replace sort of thing. Then when the final script is created, apply the search and replace to the new script for that one object change.

    Or if you could just allow a more generic set of search and replace elements that will be stored and executed when the script is generated.

    For example I am adding a new column with no default that is required, so when the script generates the output, I want to replace this:
    INSERT INTO [dbo].[tmprgxxinstalclienttypelku]([instalclienttypeid], [desctext], [actflag], [lastupdatedtm], [lastupdateusername]) SELECT [instalclienttypeid], [desctext], [actflag], [lastupdatedtm], [lastupdateusername] FROM [dbo].[instalclienttype_lku]

    With this:
    DECLARE @codelst VARCHAR(1000)
    SET @codelst = 'CANS, CON, CRPES, DS, ES, IS, IB, LAS, M, R, USA, LAA, CA, IA, RFA, EEA, RJBA, VC, VCC, FS, GBL, OTH, ESFE, SYN'

    INSERT INTO [dbo].[tmprgxxinstalclienttypelku]
    ([instalclienttypeid], [desctext], [actflag], [lastupdatedtm],
    [lastupdateusername], instalclienttypecode)
    SELECT ictl.[instalclienttypeid], ictl.[desctext], ictl.[actflag], ictl.[lastupdatedtm],
    ictl.[lastupdateusername], ISNULL(psf.value, 'NA')
    FROM [dbo].[instalclienttypelku] as ictl
    LEFT JOIN dbo.parsestringfn(@codelst, ',') AS psf
    ON ictl.instalclienttypeid = psf.order_id

    Not sure exactly how doable that is….

    A while ago I had discussed with Redgate about how to allow sql source control to create scripts for releases to deploy db changes.
    This mostly works, except when there are changes that require more logic to properly handle existing data when certain db object changes are made.

    For instance, adding a new column to a table (that has data in it) that is required, but does not have a default.

    The current way of handling this is to create a custom script for that change at the time of check in. The problem with this is that it requires… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Toast notification displays on wrong monitor

    The "toast" / desktop alert popups by the system tray always seem to show on my primary monitor (where my start menu is). However I often have the app running on my secondary monitor and it would make more sense if the popups displayed on the same monitor as the window where the action triggered the popup

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Prevent false commit

    If I make a change to a proc in management studio editor, then execute the alter. That change is not reflected in object explorer until i do a refresh of object explorer. After the commit SQL source control still show a change and this can result in your change reverting if you press commit again. Therefore sql source control should do a refresh of the committed object in object explorer after every commit.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. "SQL user without login" should be supported without Warning

    SQL user without login is not correctly detected by SQL Source Control
    The Warning displayed is confusing

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Migrated to new SVN server, timeout on existing linked databases is way too long

    We moved our SVN repositories to a new server and the old server is already gone. I then moved ahead and tried to unlink my existing databases so I can link them to new server address (svn relocate would be another option)... Problem is that sql source control is now trying to connect to the old server and the unlink dialog is just sitting there for minutes, and I'm getting "Visual Studio is busy...." messages

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Initial Setup  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. initial checkout failure not cought

    I was checking out a database that contained changes. (new machine, database restored from backup)

    The initial checkout from SVN failed because of a network issue. However the UI did not report that failure and instead proceeded to compare my current database to the local broken working copy.

    It seems that the code executing the checkout is wrapped in an exception eating try catch block.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Initial Setup  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Simplify datalink source code repository migration

    We recently migrated our svn repo to HTTPS and part of that process was for our devs to update their SQL Source Control datalinks.

    We ran into 4 issues:
    1) When opening SSMS for the first time, we were inundated by SQL Source Control to update our credentials.
    2) After hitting cancel 10 times, we were able to get to the Setup tab. Where we thought we could just edit the existing link, but instead we had to Unlink the database first.
    3) After unlinking, all the options on the Setup tab disappeared requiring a restart of SSMS. I can provide a screenshot if that would be useful.
    4) Then while linking it hung at 10% for a really long time, even though we could see data going back and forth to the svn server using Resource Monitor.

    After that it was clear sailing.

    We recently migrated our svn repo to HTTPS and part of that process was for our devs to update their SQL Source Control datalinks.

    We ran into 4 issues:
    1) When opening SSMS for the first time, we were inundated by SQL Source Control to update our credentials.
    2) After hitting cancel 10 times, we were able to get to the Setup tab. Where we thought we could just edit the existing link, but instead we had to Unlink the database first.
    3) After unlinking, all the options on the Setup tab disappeared requiring a restart of SSMS. I can… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Initial Setup  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Automatic source control migration scripts facilitation/generation/recording.

    When using development tools to modify a schema, you can end up having applied a number of changes which cannot be applied without data loss using schema differencing and which need to be included in a migration script.

    It would be helpful if there was some form of SQL trace which could monitor schema changes actually applied, and be used to generate a composite migration script.

    If I use Enterprise manager, or Red Gate to refactor the schema, it is up to me to remember to save the generated SQL and any other SQL I might write along the way and compose a migration script.

    I imagine this works well if you have very formal and proscriptive schema development procedures, but if you have a more exploratory style, you may find you have applied a set of changes that you no longer have the scripts for and can only do schema differencing to get from old to new.

    If the DB statement execution was tracked, you could record all queries which had schema or data side effects and then have a simple of (complex) process to generate an amalgamated/derived script to do a proper migration of old to new.

    When using development tools to modify a schema, you can end up having applied a number of changes which cannot be applied without data loss using schema differencing and which need to be included in a migration script.

    It would be helpful if there was some form of SQL trace which could monitor schema changes actually applied, and be used to generate a composite migration script.

    If I use Enterprise manager, or Red Gate to refactor the schema, it is up to me to remember to save the generated SQL and any other SQL I might write along the way… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. On the "Get Latest" page, provide a way to globally un-check all objects

    Can you please provide a way to "Uncheck" the entire list of objects on the "Get Latest" tab. I have 100+ objects ( Team of 6 Devs ) to get latest and 3 or 4 objects have issues, so I have to manually uncheck each of the 100 checkboxes and then check just the ones I think are ok to check in

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Better Support for Shared Db Dev Model  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Disregard pending changes WITHOUT revert

    It can and does happen.. you end up with objects that you know are in production but for whatever reason never got committed and put into a migration script. Or, you just aren't interested in ever putting a certain change live.. maybe they are dev only. Maybe they are irrelevant objects like users. Maybe a naughty dev put stuff live without going through the proper process.

    In all the above cases I want to be able to remove the object from my "pending" list without reverting. I want to ignore them completely.

    I am aware of the ability to filter but I find this cumbersome and unsuitable in the case where I know I will never be committing a change.

    It can and does happen.. you end up with objects that you know are in production but for whatever reason never got committed and put into a migration script. Or, you just aren't interested in ever putting a certain change live.. maybe they are dev only. Maybe they are irrelevant objects like users. Maybe a naughty dev put stuff live without going through the proper process.

    In all the above cases I want to be able to remove the object from my "pending" list without reverting. I want to ignore them completely.

    I am aware of the ability to filter… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Directory and File Locations

    Allow the ability to control the location of ALL files/data (permanent and temporary and logging, etc) associated with SSC. This should be asked during setup, but should also be user configurable after install.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Initial Setup  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close