588 results found
-
Allow Setup at the INSTANCE Level
Please consider allowing, in a single action, the addition of ALL (or a selection of) databases in a server to the same base VSS location. This would require you to create new projects under the root for each DB and simply auto-commit the changes. Currently, Initial setup on servers with dozens of DBs is quite daunting.
4 votes -
commit changes: Enhance mousewheel in Text Comparison
In the lower panel where I compare the text of different Versions I expect more functionality, when I use the mousewheel, e.g.:
Ctrl+Wheel: Change Text Size
Shift+Wheel: Scroll Horizontally
Ctrl+Shift+Wheel: ??4 votes -
DB level Extended Properties
We have extended properties setup on the database level that currently can't be checked into source control. It would be nice to have that as an option to look at DB level extended properties.
4 votes -
4 votes
-
Drop statement in script
Would be nice to have the option to include the drop statement inside of each object script. The option would be global over all scripts.
EX: IF (OBJECT_ID('MyTable') IS NOT NULL) DROP TABLE MyTable
4 votes -
Partition scheme Bug?
We have a partition scheme setup using a function
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [partitionSchemeSystemId]
AS PARTITION [partitionFunctionSystemId]
TO ([PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY])when SourceControl has populated SVN it has added an extra partition to the scheme
Sourcecontrol sees these as being the same between the DB used to populate SVN but when we link a new instance of the database to sourcecontrol it identifies a conflict
4 votes -
Connections to TempDB
With a team of 6 using source control, we are finding the performance of both SSMS on individual machines and our developement SQL box to be crippled by Source control.
Our developement server is showing literally hundreds of connections to TempDB from Sql source Control which is slowing the box considerably
4 votes -
Login information for SQL Source Control
Where login information is stored for SQl Source Control 3? If A user is using B users SVN credentials and later on A user get its own SVN credentials. How user A can force SVN to ask his own credentials?
4 votes -
Database properties included into stored proc script
Currently RedGate includes these lines to every stored procedure it puts into SVC:
"SET QUOTEDIDENTIFIER ON" and the "SET ANSINULLS ON"
Actually I don't think it makes much sense because these are simply db properties and should be tracked and version controlled as a separate database properties script, but not included into every stored procedure file.
OR it would be nice if we simply can turn it off.4 votes -
Script linked server names
Imagine we have a complex database which uses a lot of other databases via linked servers. Now imagine it's a dev environment, we put this complex database into SVC and do development.
The problem begins when we're about to release to a prod environment via RedGate Compare, prod environment has all required linked servers and foreign database with they all come with different names. The inability to use variables inside RedGate makes it difficult to script linked servers and foreign database names. Ideally it could be something like VS Database for Professionals + SQLCMD4 votes -
When doing a "get latest", only require read permissions.
I would like to be able to allow people to get a copy of the latest set of development functions, etc. kept in a repository. I don't want everyone to be able to write new/modify existing functions. Currently when they try to do a get latest, it errors out saying they need read, check in, check out, and lock permissions. To get around this I've given everyone full permissions in TFS. I don't understand why that would be necessary for a get latest.
4 votes -
Bug: Highlighting changed objects - then they disappear
BUG: When a table is changed it is moved from its alphabetic position in teh list to the bottom of the list and highlighted, which is a pain in large databases
If you don't immediately commit the table and make more changes it is removed from the table list altogether and you have to refresh to get the table back again - I know this is the default behaviour for new tables but the highight, put in wrong place, remove action is wrong - it should either highlight and leave in place or wait until a refresh is done and…4 votes -
SQL Source Control 3.1.0.5208 Failure to load Add-on to SQL Server 2008 R2
This is actually a defect in the product. After upgrading to 3.1.0.5208 of the SQL Source Control, the Add-On for SQL Server 2008 R2 no longer loads. I had to revert to using 3.0.13.4214
4 votes -
BUG: commit changes include other objects although I have specified that it should not include other objects than the ones i have checked
BUG: commit changes include other objects although I have specified that it should not include other objects than the ones i have checked
4 votes -
Add button Stop/Start Checking for modifications
Sometime I work with proxy of my customer and my DB, linked to source control, can't connect.
Please, I need a Start-Stop button to stop the connection with the source control in this situation. Thank you.4 votes -
When opening SSMS show all databases with differences in the Object Explorer view without having to select each individual database
When opening SSMS highlight all databases with uncommitted changes in the Object Explorer view without having to select each individual database.
4 votes -
I just want to add, query by query, to track changes. When i commit a query, the whole damn DB of queries (1000+) loads. Too cumbersome.
New user, I just want to add a query as I develop, to track changes. I expect to 1) Add a query to source control. 2) Commit the query 3) Track changes........ Problem is, every time I commit the query, the entire DB stored procedures load into memory, slow and not working for me.
4 votes -
Bug message -- An inconsistancy was detected during an internal operation in database . . .
Got an error message running a data compare:
Bug message -- An inconsistancy was detected during an internal operation in database 'DWC' (ID:5) on page (1:3531152). Please contact technical support. Reference number 7.
When I tried to find a link in the program to technical support, best match I saw took me here. Maybe you need a better link or even a "Contact Support" button which pasted the text of the message into an e-mail or something along those lines?
4 votes -
Allow users to change the Transaction Isolation Level. Serializable causes problems with linked servers.
Ever since updating to 3.6.0.3, the default Transaction Isolation Level in deployment scripts is Serializable. If a stored procedure has a reference to a linked database it will fail. I have to manually edit every script now and change it to Read Committed...
4 votes -
Mark renamed objects, in particular sprocs, views, udfs
When using Mercurial linking, is it possible to add a feature to allow you to mark renamed object (in particular sprocs, views, udfs), so that the change history remains?
At the moment I am forced to use "Working Directory" so that I can save the changes and tell Mercurial that the object has been renamed.
Using the Mercurial link results in an added file and a deleted file and a lost of change history.
I realise there is already a completed feature for the renaming of tables to stop data loss, which can now be done with the Migrations (…
4 votes
- Don't see your idea?