Skip to content

SQL Source Control

Welcome to the SQL Source Control feature suggestion list. Find out more information about SQL Source Control at http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-source-control/.

If you have any questions, need help or have found a bug in SQL Source Control, please review our support information http://redgatesupport.red-gate.com/home.

To get new features, performance improvements and bug fixes as soon as they’re available, you may want to turn on frequent updates: http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-source-control/frequent-updates

SQL Source Control

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

588 results found

  1. Please consider allowing, in a single action, the addition of ALL (or a selection of) databases in a server to the same base VSS location. This would require you to create new projects under the root for each DB and simply auto-commit the changes. Currently, Initial setup on servers with dozens of DBs is quite daunting.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. In the lower panel where I compare the text of different Versions I expect more functionality, when I use the mousewheel, e.g.:
    Ctrl+Wheel: Change Text Size
    Shift+Wheel: Scroll Horizontally
    Ctrl+Shift+Wheel: ??

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We have extended properties setup on the database level that currently can't be checked into source control. It would be nice to have that as an option to look at DB level extended properties.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Would be nice to have the option to include the drop statement inside of each object script. The option would be global over all scripts.

    EX: IF (OBJECT_ID('MyTable') IS NOT NULL) DROP TABLE MyTable

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. We have a partition scheme setup using a function

    CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [partitionSchemeSystemId]
    AS PARTITION [partitionFunctionSystemId]
    TO ([PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY], [PRIMARY])

    when SourceControl has populated SVN it has added an extra partition to the scheme

    Sourcecontrol sees these as being the same between the DB used to populate SVN but when we link a new instance of the database to sourcecontrol it identifies a conflict

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. With a team of 6 using source control, we are finding the performance of both SSMS on individual machines and our developement SQL box to be crippled by Source control.

    Our developement server is showing literally hundreds of connections to TempDB from Sql source Control which is slowing the box considerably

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Where login information is stored for SQl Source Control 3? If A user is using B users SVN credentials and later on A user get its own SVN credentials. How user A can force SVN to ask his own credentials?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently RedGate includes these lines to every stored procedure it puts into SVC:
    "SET QUOTEDIDENTIFIER ON" and the "SET ANSINULLS ON"
    Actually I don't think it makes much sense because these are simply db properties and should be tracked and version controlled as a separate database properties script, but not included into every stored procedure file.
    OR it would be nice if we simply can turn it off.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Imagine we have a complex database which uses a lot of other databases via linked servers. Now imagine it's a dev environment, we put this complex database into SVC and do development.
    The problem begins when we're about to release to a prod environment via RedGate Compare, prod environment has all required linked servers and foreign database with they all come with different names. The inability to use variables inside RedGate makes it difficult to script linked servers and foreign database names. Ideally it could be something like VS Database for Professionals + SQLCMD

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I would like to be able to allow people to get a copy of the latest set of development functions, etc. kept in a repository. I don't want everyone to be able to write new/modify existing functions. Currently when they try to do a get latest, it errors out saying they need read, check in, check out, and lock permissions. To get around this I've given everyone full permissions in TFS. I don't understand why that would be necessary for a get latest.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. BUG: When a table is changed it is moved from its alphabetic position in teh list to the bottom of the list and highlighted, which is a pain in large databases
    If you don't immediately commit the table and make more changes it is removed from the table list altogether and you have to refresh to get the table back again - I know this is the default behaviour for new tables but the highight, put in wrong place, remove action is wrong - it should either highlight and leave in place or wait until a refresh is done and…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. This is actually a defect in the product. After upgrading to 3.1.0.5208 of the SQL Source Control, the Add-On for SQL Server 2008 R2 no longer loads. I had to revert to using 3.0.13.4214

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. BUG: commit changes include other objects although I have specified that it should not include other objects than the ones i have checked

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Sometime I work with proxy of my customer and my DB, linked to source control, can't connect.
    Please, I need a Start-Stop button to stop the connection with the source control in this situation. Thank you.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When opening SSMS highlight all databases with uncommitted changes in the Object Explorer view without having to select each individual database.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. New user, I just want to add a query as I develop, to track changes. I expect to 1) Add a query to source control. 2) Commit the query 3) Track changes........ Problem is, every time I commit the query, the entire DB stored procedures load into memory, slow and not working for me.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Got an error message running a data compare:

    Bug message -- An inconsistancy was detected during an internal operation in database 'DWC' (ID:5) on page (1:3531152). Please contact technical support. Reference number 7.

    When I tried to find a link in the program to technical support, best match I saw took me here. Maybe you need a better link or even a "Contact Support" button which pasted the text of the message into an e-mail or something along those lines?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Ever since updating to 3.6.0.3, the default Transaction Isolation Level in deployment scripts is Serializable. If a stored procedure has a reference to a linked database it will fail. I have to manually edit every script now and change it to Read Committed...

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. When using Mercurial linking, is it possible to add a feature to allow you to mark renamed object (in particular sprocs, views, udfs), so that the change history remains?

    At the moment I am forced to use "Working Directory" so that I can save the changes and tell Mercurial that the object has been renamed.

    Using the Mercurial link results in an added file and a deleted file and a lost of change history.

    I realise there is already a completed feature for the renaming of tables to stop data loss, which can now be done with the Migrations (…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?