Skip to content

SQL Source Control

Welcome to the SQL Source Control feature suggestion list. Find out more information about SQL Source Control at http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-source-control/.

If you have any questions, need help or have found a bug in SQL Source Control, please review our support information http://redgatesupport.red-gate.com/home.

To get new features, performance improvements and bug fixes as soon as they’re available, you may want to turn on frequent updates: http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-source-control/frequent-updates

SQL Source Control

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

588 results found

  1. This filter should exclude an object with a schema that has a matching name.

    -- All Objects

    Exclude where (@SCHEMA = 'tSQLt') OR (@SCHEMA = 'SQLCop')

    Did not exclude this schema object definition.

    -- Schema

    CREATE SCHEMA [tSQLt]
    AUTHORIZATION [dbo]
    GO

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. When committing changes it would be nice to be able to mark changed items as "Covered / Included in existing migration script" so that they are not checked into source control. I am specifically talking about uncommitted schema changes. For example, transferring a table to a different schema. SQL Source Control sees this as a drop (from old schema) and create (in new schema), but there are times when it should be an ALTER SCHEMA statement in order not to lose the data from the table. The ALTER SCHEMA can be added to an existing migration script instead of creating…

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. This has over 50 votes but its in SQL Prompt. This is a HUGE pain for us as we need to use AD to adhere to security policy.
    https://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/94413-sql-prompt/suggestions/15008409-add-support-for-azure-active-directory-authenticat

    285 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Azure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Kendra responded

    Thanks to everyone for submitting feedback on this in the form of both voting and comments.

    Currently, SQL Source Control does not have strong support for Azure SQL Database: as folks have noted in this item, AAD support, particularly with multi-factor authentication, is desired. Currently SQL Source Control does not work at all with Azure SQL Database with MFA enabled.

    An additional issue worth mentioning is that pains with SQL Source Control performance may be worse than interacting with Azure SQL Database due to latency.

    We would like to improve the user experience and support for Azure SQL Database, and doing so almost certainly involves addressing both of these issues. This is an area we are beginning to investigate more fully.

  4. If you have a HiDPI or 4K display, SSMS is scaled to 2x. In SQL Source Control, The Commit and Get Latest tabs are fine, but the Migrations, Locking and Setup UI are scaled MUCH larger than 2x. I would prefer those UIs be scaled to 2x.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It is not possible to resize the columns on the Migrations tab. This makes it difficult knowing which objects to include when creating new migration scripts as most of the names are truncated.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. If I exclude items from source control they should not default to be committed due to dependencies. It would be great if there was a setting when items are excluded to never include them in the list of items that are dependencies.

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Get rid of the option for anybody to unlock an object, but instead allow to unlock only by the person that locked the object or by a group in group role in the database where only few people have access.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Sometimes I'm connected to multiple instances and it would be nice if the Source Control tab made it clear which instance I was about to change or commit from.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. SQL Source Control needs a history view, to be able to view historical Commit/Get updates. A simple list of when/who etc then the ability to see the script used?

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  History/Log  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. When linking static data to source control the unicode characters are appearing as question marks
    so please add the support for the unicode characters in the script files

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Static Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Merge conflicts cannot be resolved if both users commit and one of them pushes.

    To reproduce this behavior:
    1) user A performs a change on a line of a SP
    2) user A commits and pushes
    3) user B performs a change on the same line of the same SP
    4) user B commits
    5) user B tries to pull and a message says conflicts must be resolved outside SQL Source Control and it is also impossible to push (please see the attached screenshots)

    Only if user B performs step 4 after step 5 it is possible to see the…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. It would be really nice if SQL Source Control allowed commit undo like git reset --soft or tracked the filesystem as Git does instead of tracking commits.

    Scenario that highlights this unexpected behavior:
    - perform some changes on the DB
    - commit changes
    - perform a git reset --soft from command line (undoing the commit while keeping changes on the DB and file system is not possible from the SQL Source Control UI)
    - if further changes are performed from the UI it is possible to commit current changes (old + further changes), but if SQL scripts are changed directly,…

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The blue circle indicating changes to be commited should auto-refresh (added/removed when necessary) and refresh when the SQL Server refresh icon or menuitem are clicked.

    Now it only refreshes when the user goes on the Commit or GetLatest tab.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Using the latest verrsion I cannot create a migration script for selected changes (checkins in the versioning control system).
    The menu option it had in the database context menu is missing.
    Why did you remove this feature?
    It was nice for allowing migrating environments that you cannot connect to.

    33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When doing a Get Latest in SQL Source Control, if database is registered in DLM, then register the known schema from SQL Source Control

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We are unable to use SQL Compare to deploy Migration Scripts to all of our environments and simultaneously maintain commit level control over what does or does not get deployed to each environment for each release, especially with the high volume of changes and the number of last minute changes to release choices in the final stages of release planning. The amount of manual review of the final deployment script is unsustainable.

    Using Powershell, we would like to auto-generate Migration Scripts for each Commit/ChangeSet and Commit those Migration Scripts to TFS. This would allow us to modify the content of…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. I modified 10+ tables by dropping and creating an index. On two tables the index didn't exist and I had to create it. Big was my surprise that those two tables had a different user than me set as the owner of the change. It is even more strange that each table has a different user mentioned as the change owner.

    No big issue, but still something weird. And perhaps better if the change is linked to the user doing the change.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  History/Log  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Add option like SQL Search application for quick acces to object

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Please give option for DML trigger changes be tracked separately from tables. It's very annoying trying to support and enhance a trigger-heavy inherited database that needs an extensive trigger optimizations. It doesn't allow me to isolate and rollback my changes very easily ... and branching and integrating - ha! This was almost a big enough deal to send me to ApexSQL... alas, I am regretting my decision these days. It seems people have been requesting this feature in Source Control and Compare for a while... please stop pushing it aside - it's frustrating. Thanks

    77 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 5 7 9 29 30
  • Don't see your idea?